2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does ICT-based aquaculture extension contribute to greater adoption of good management practices and improved incomes? Evidence from Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there are three possible and partly overlapping explanations about the observed improvements in dietary diversity, namely food purchases, crop diversity, and nutrition awareness. Regarding food purchase, as outlined in the previous paragraph, beneficiary households generally improved both their total income and aquaculture income per unit area (see also Ntiri et al, 2022;Filipski & Belton, 2018;Karim et al, 2020), which essentially increases their ability to purchase a diversity of food options, as has been identified in other contexts (Kassam, 2014). Regarding crop diversity, a key element of the intervention was to provide seeds of different crop species to promote food production in pond dykes and home gardens (Sect.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, there are three possible and partly overlapping explanations about the observed improvements in dietary diversity, namely food purchases, crop diversity, and nutrition awareness. Regarding food purchase, as outlined in the previous paragraph, beneficiary households generally improved both their total income and aquaculture income per unit area (see also Ntiri et al, 2022;Filipski & Belton, 2018;Karim et al, 2020), which essentially increases their ability to purchase a diversity of food options, as has been identified in other contexts (Kassam, 2014). Regarding crop diversity, a key element of the intervention was to provide seeds of different crop species to promote food production in pond dykes and home gardens (Sect.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There are several different approaches to elicit the impact of development interventions including assessing changes 2016) or counterfactual analysis (i.e., comparisons with groups that did not receive the intervention) (e.g., Aung et al, 2023;Dam Lam et al, 2022). Counterfactual techniques vary in their ability to randomize the assignment of beneficiaries to the intervention, and include randomized control trials (Ragasa et al, 2022b;Verbowski et al, 2018) and matching approaches (Ntiri et al, 2022;Tran et al, 2020).…”
Section: Impact Elicitation: Propensity Score Matching (Psm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tingkat umur menjadi pengaruh signifikan dalam penggunaan literasi (Alant & Bakare, 2021). Penyuluhan berbasis seluler lebih mudah diakses oleh kaum muda dan petani yang lebih berpendidikan sehingga dapat menjadi media yang baik untuk menjangkau kelompok-kelompok ini (Ntiri et al, 2022). Pengguna paling sedikit yaitu pada rentang usia 13-22 tahun.…”
Section: Gambar 3 Distribusi Pengguna Berdasarkan Tipe Profesi (%)unclassified
“…Pendampungan atau penyuluhan secara digital akan lebih mudah dalam membangun jaringan, koordinasi dan bertukar informasi (Baumüller et al, 2023). Teknologi informasi dan komunikasi memiliki pengaruh yang positif terhadap penerapan GAP dalam melakukan kegiatan budidaya pertanian, meningkatkan produktivitas pertanian, dan pendapatan petani (Ntiri et al, 2022). Selain itu dengan pemanfaatan fitur gambar dan video meningkatkan penggunaan teknologi dan praktik yang direkomendasikan dengan meningkatkan akses penyuluhan dan pengetahuan petani (Alant & Bakare, 2021).…”
Section: Gambar 3 Distribusi Pengguna Berdasarkan Tipe Profesi (%)unclassified