2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-09933-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does it matter being innovative: Teachers’ technology acceptance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the low variance, their practical impact on satisfaction is arguable. Thus, we are cautious in claiming a relationship between selfefficacy and satisfaction.Several studies have shown that both performance expectancy and effort expectancy have direct influence on teachers' technology acceptance(Chen & Tseng, 2012;Mazman Akar, 2019;Scherer & Teo, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the low variance, their practical impact on satisfaction is arguable. Thus, we are cautious in claiming a relationship between selfefficacy and satisfaction.Several studies have shown that both performance expectancy and effort expectancy have direct influence on teachers' technology acceptance(Chen & Tseng, 2012;Mazman Akar, 2019;Scherer & Teo, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this new context, teachers can become facilitators who help students in their learning processes (De la Torre, 2005). This change also implies that teachers must become active teaching actors, figures who guide, advise, energise, motivate and manage diverse learning environments (Mazman, 2019) while students improve their self-regulation processes and evolve into the central characters of the process (Choi et al, 2005;Dabbagh & Kitsantas, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final questionnaire consists of 10 items answered on a 5-point Likert-type response scale. In order to design these items, pertinent studies such as Downing & Haladyna (2006), Fonseca-Pedrero & Muñiz (2017, 2019 and Hernández et al, (2016) were considered. This way, participants only had to read the items and mark the response, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Joo, Park, and Kim underlined "teacher self-efficacy, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of using technology affected teachers' intention to use technology" (2018, p.48). Moreover, personal innovativeness is also important in teachers' technology acceptance (Mazman Akar, 2019) and similarly, kindergarten teachers' innovativeness and subjective norm have an important role in the decision to use technology in class or not (Jeong & Kim, 2017). Not surprisingly factors that affect teachers' technology acceptance vary according to the research context.…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%