2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does life satisfaction reduce risk of incident hypertension and stroke? Evidence from the Whitehall II cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, no association was found between happiness status and low awareness of hypertension treatment. This result is consistent with data obtained in a cohort study with a 31-year follow-up in London, which revealed the lack of robust associations between life satisfaction and incident hypertension [ 65 ]. One unexpected finding is that health insurance coverage was not associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, no association was found between happiness status and low awareness of hypertension treatment. This result is consistent with data obtained in a cohort study with a 31-year follow-up in London, which revealed the lack of robust associations between life satisfaction and incident hypertension [ 65 ]. One unexpected finding is that health insurance coverage was not associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The use of this instrument in primary care will help experts to reinforcement of all satisfaction parameters in relation to levels of care, as well as the contribution of patients with type 2 diabetes, enriching the interaction physicians, patients and nurse. [ 25 26 27 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between life satisfaction and CVD risk has been investigated, yet no decisive conclusions have been reached [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Most previous studies were limited by the short follow-up periods, suggesting that reverse causality bias might have influenced their results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%