2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00500.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does RV Lead Positioning Provide Additional Benefit to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure?

Abstract: RVHS stimulation has no overall advantage as an alternative stimulation site for RVA during BiV pacing. RVHS was equivalent with RVA in combination with the PL LV site, while RVA was superior to RVHS in combination with AL or LAT LV site.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differ from those of Shimano [14] who found that RV apical pacing conferred benefit in combination with an anterolateral and lateral LV lead over an RV septal lead position. However, nearly all the patients (29/31) had DCM, and it would appear that the extent and position of myocardial scar affects the acute and chronic response to CRT.…”
Section: Combination Of LV and Rv Lead Positioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results differ from those of Shimano [14] who found that RV apical pacing conferred benefit in combination with an anterolateral and lateral LV lead over an RV septal lead position. However, nearly all the patients (29/31) had DCM, and it would appear that the extent and position of myocardial scar affects the acute and chronic response to CRT.…”
Section: Combination Of LV and Rv Lead Positioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Single-site RV pacing outflow tract and/or septal pacing have been associated with acute hemodynamic response [32,33] and reduced wall motion abnormalities compared with apical position [34]. Shimano [14] and Hay [35] both found limited influence on the AHR of RV stimulation site during BIV pacing. Leclercq [36] defined optimal BIV pacing mode by the degree of QRS narrowing and found that BIV pacing with the RV lead inserted in the RV outflow tract was superior in 11 patients (69%) and in the RV apex in seven patients (39%).…”
Section: Septal Vs Apical Rv Lead Positionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were processed with Power Laboratory recording and analysis software (AD Instruments, Oxfordshire, UK) as described previously. 18 Then, using a 6F guiding catheter, we performed coronary angiography to determine the optimal location of the occlusion and assessment of coronary artery size after administration of nitroglycerine (0.2 mg). Depending on the visual estimate of vessel size, an over-the-wire-type angioplasty balloon catheter (diameter, 3.0±0.5 mm; length, 18 mm; Boston Scientific Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was placed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) distal to the first major diagonal branch.…”
Section: Pig Model Of Myocardial I/rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,[40][41][42][43] RV lead positioning may also important for CRT response, but the evidence for this is inconclusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%