2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the degree of calcification of the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery on preoperative computerized tomography predict the risk of anastomotic leak after right colectomy? A single center retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical significance of aortic calcium scores and abdominal arteries has not been widely studied in the literature. A few authors studied atheroma as a risk factor for anastomosis leakage [19][20][21][22]25] or as being associated with the diameter of the main bile duct [26]. Our study suggests that among the abdominal arteries, calcifications of the superior mesenteric artery were the most strongly associated with mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The clinical significance of aortic calcium scores and abdominal arteries has not been widely studied in the literature. A few authors studied atheroma as a risk factor for anastomosis leakage [19][20][21][22]25] or as being associated with the diameter of the main bile duct [26]. Our study suggests that among the abdominal arteries, calcifications of the superior mesenteric artery were the most strongly associated with mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, no association was found with mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis. 28 Kornmann et al could not confirm these findings using a similar scoring method in patients who underwent colorectal surgery. 18 Secondly, two of the five studies in subcategory B considered the total amount of calcification.…”
Section: Subcategory Bmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Methodological item for non--randomized studies Boersema 19 Eveno 27 Komen 16 Kornmann 18 Lee 29 Pochhammer 26 Postaire 28 Shen 17 The maximum score is 24 points. 0 = not reported, 1 = reported but not adequate, 2 = adequate reported; A MINORS score of 12< was considered to be poor-, 12-17 was moderate-and >17 was good methodological quality -6 - For the 500 HU analysis, univariate analysis did not show significant differences in patient characteristics or vascular trajectories.…”
Section: Methodological Item For Non--randomized Studies (Minors) Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations