Does the Emperor Have Financial Crisis Clothes? Reflections on the Legal Basis of the European Banking Authority

Abstract

The European Union institutional package launched in response to the financial crisis used Article 114 TFEU as its legal basis. The author explores the legal basis for one of the European Supervisory Authorities recently established-the European Banking Authority (EBA). The use of Article 114 TFEU, the main Treaty basis used to harmonise laws in order to further the internal market, as the foundation for the EBA, is considered in detail. A paradox of contemporary EU Institutional law is assessed here, considering whether on the one hand, the EBA is functionally both too narrow and too broad as a matter of law, while on the other hand, it may prove to be central to restoring confidence in EU regulatory powers, rendering it "too big to fail," despite its slender foundations in Article 114 TFEU.

The Principle of Institutional (Un)Balance after Lisbon

“…Indeed, the combination between the features of Union agencies, a de facto uncontrolled delegation and the power to adopt measures both of general and individual nature overruling those of national authorities appear as substantially stretching the wording of the constitutional provision. 47 Further, the broader constitutional reflections developed by the AG remain largely unaddressed.…”

Regulating European financial markets between crisis and Brexit

“…Even though they are soft law by nature, they gain quasi-legal relevance through certain procedural requirements (Schemmel, 2016). This character ambiguity makes them one of the most discussed phenomena in the literature on the ESA (Busuioc, 2013;Chiti, 2013;Fahey, 2012;Moloney, 2011a;van Rijsbergen, 2014;Wörner, 2017). This article, however, will discuss the instruments that are most relevant to the principles of European Union law and have proven to be pacemakers for the European integration: ESA' powers on Level 2 and 4, i.e.…”