2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0195-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)?

Abstract: BackgroundThere is disagreement about the optimal torque for tightening smartpegs for resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Subjective finger pressure during hand tightening could affect the reliability of the resulting values. The aim of the current study was therefore to assess whether or not the insertion torque of a smartpeg magnetic device influences the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value during RFA.MethodsThirty self-tapping screw implants (XiVE S, Dentsply Sirona Implants, Bensheim, Germany) with a di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that increased probing depths indicate peri‐implant bone loss 18 . The ISQ measurement with the Ostell device is a reproducible method 19 and a widely accepted method for determining implant stability 20 . According to the manufacturer's information (W&H), a load from a value of 60 and over is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that increased probing depths indicate peri‐implant bone loss 18 . The ISQ measurement with the Ostell device is a reproducible method 19 and a widely accepted method for determining implant stability 20 . According to the manufacturer's information (W&H), a load from a value of 60 and over is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some aspects that could affect ISQ values, such as implant length and diameter were controlled using the same implant size for all measurements. Another limitation was the manual tightening of the transducers, but this technique was previously reported to be objective and reliable [20]. Finally, it was not possible to blind the investigators within the instrument used, and the study was performed in an animal model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of early loading is not based on specific biological criteria, and the timing can make a significant difference in the stages of healing [ 41 ]. Therefore, the use of transepithelial abutments of different heights (on which the SmartPeg can be screwed), placed on the day of surgery and maintained throughout the healing process, allows the implants to be monitored during the descent and subsequent ascent of implant stability, applying a minimum torque (4–5 N) [ 25 ], instead of the 10N needed to unscrew a conventional transepithelial abutment to perform RFA directly to the implant platform, thus minimizing the risk of implant failure [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. The implementation of an RFA measurement protocol through transepithelial abutments can decrease the pre-established loading times and therefore produce an improvement in the implant treatment quality [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%