Does the platform switching implant affect the crestal bone level? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eldien, Asma M. Serag; Mahmoud, Enji Ahmed; Hamed, Huda; Shoeib, Mona

doi:10.31254/dentistry.2019.4106

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the PS interrupts infiltration of the inflammation and consequently prevents the migration of the tissues around the implant apically. [9][10][11] Preservation of bone around the dental implant is a challenge. Comprehensive research concerning the assessment of marginal bone loss around implants has been established.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Platform Switched Implants on Marginal Bone Level in Mandibular Overdentures: A Six-Year Follow-Up Longitudinal Study

Rahim¹,

Ashour²

2022

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the impact of the platform-switched implant on marginal bone loss (MBL) and the probing pocket depth (PPD) in patients wearing mandibular overdenture. Patients and Methods This longitudinal study included 40 completely edentulous patients aged 51–64 years. All patients received complete dentures and were distributed into two groups randomly; 20 patients each. The first group GI received two platform switched implants; however, the 2nd group GII received two platform matched implants (3.6 × 11.5 mm) in the canine region of the mandible. The radiographic evaluations were carried out every year for six years, whereas probing pocket depth was evaluated every six months for 72 months for both groups. The data were analyzed by repeated ANOVA, Friedman’s, and Student’s t -test. Results This study included 36 patients; 56 ± 3.6 years was the mean age; 17 females (47%) and 19 males (53%) completed the study. Statistically significant differences were observed in MBL and PPD in each of GI and GII after 6 years, p ≤ 0.05. Between GI and GII after 6 years, a statistically insignificant difference was detected in MBL or PPD, p ≥ 0.05, except in PPD at loading, 2 and 6 years, p ≤ 0.05. Conclusion Time positively affected MBL and PPD in platform switched and matched implants retained mandibular overdentures. Platform switching influences probing pocket depth in implants retained mandibular overdentures.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Platform Switched Implants on Marginal Bone Level in Mandibular Overdentures: A Six-Year Follow-Up Longitudinal Study

Rahim¹,

Ashour²

2022

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Does the platform switching implant affect the crestal bone level? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Objectives: To assess the effects of platform switching in patients restored with implant supported fixed restorations on implant failure and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: We searched the

Cited by 1 publication

References 25 publications

Impact of Platform Switched Implants on Marginal Bone Level in Mandibular Overdentures: A Six-Year Follow-Up Longitudinal Study

Impact of Platform Switched Implants on Marginal Bone Level in Mandibular Overdentures: A Six-Year Follow-Up Longitudinal Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About