2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Vertebral End Plate Morphology Affect Cage Subsidence After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 15 studies that discussed cage subsidence after LIF [ 20 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 44 , 45 , 49 53 , 55 ], with qualities of moderate ( n = 11) and high ( n = 4). For the 2,558 cages pooled across these studies, 705 cages had subsidence (27.6%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There were 15 studies that discussed cage subsidence after LIF [ 20 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 44 , 45 , 49 53 , 55 ], with qualities of moderate ( n = 11) and high ( n = 4). For the 2,558 cages pooled across these studies, 705 cages had subsidence (27.6%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 2,558 cages pooled across these studies, 705 cages had subsidence (27.6%). Thresholds for identification of subsidence varied between 2 and 4 mm across studies [ 20 , 31 , 34 , 37 , 40 , 49 , 51 , 53 , 55 ]. Three studies classified subsidence into four grades based on the loss of disc height after LIF (Grade 0: a loss of 0–24% in disc height; Grade I: 25–49%; Grade II: 50–74%; Grade III: 75–100%), with a loss in disc height of 24% indicative of considerable cage subsidence [ 36 , 44 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Apparently, the high incidence of damage to the endplates in some studies is due to the fact that the authors used CT scans to verify subsidence, which revealed small degrees of subsidence not detectable with X-ray. In TLIF, the subsidence rate is significantly higher — 15.9% [ 43 ], which is associated with a smaller area of the cage support [ 44 ]. According to some authors, with lateral fusion, there is a significant risk of damage to the endplates when the surgeon installs a large cage in patients with reduced bone density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%