Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies

Beghtol, Clare

doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199501)46:1<30::aid-asi4>3.0.co;2-f

Cited by 41 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A classificação de ficção de Baker foi desenvolvida com método hierárquico com o objetivo de proporcionar ao usuário quais seriam as melhores obras para leitura. Na área de Ciência da Informação encontramos várias pesquisas que têm como preocupação a representação das obras de ficção, dentre elas: Burgess (1936), Spiller (1980), Pejtersen e Austin (1983), Harrel (1985, Beghtol (1986), Jansson e Sodervall (1987), Macpherson (1987), Beghtol (1989), Bell (1991), Olderr (1991), Ranta (1991), Hayes (1992), Beghtol (1992), Beghtol (1994a), Negrini (1995), Andersson e Holst (1996), Hidderley e Rafferty (1997), Nielson (1997), Saarti (1997), Beghtol (1997), Saarti (1999aSaarti ( , 1999bSaarti ( , 2002. Os temas mais pesquisados por estes autores foram: sistema de classificação para obras de ficção; como prover a recuperação da informação de ficção; a construção de tesauros para ficção; a indexação de obras de ficção e a construção de catálogos.…”

Section: Indexação De Obras De Ficção E O Modelo Metodológicounclassified

Indexação de obras de ficção em bibliotecas universitárias: avaliação e adequação do Modelo para indexação de ficção (MENTIF)

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metodologia de indexação Obras de ficçãoBibliotecas universitárias RESUMOA indexação de obras de ficção para catálogos de bibliotecas necessita de metodologia apropriada à estrutura textual de narrativa de ficção. A falta de uma metodologia de indexação limita a representação e recuperação de assuntos no catálogo. A proposta metodológica do Modelo de Indexação de ficção (MENTIF) amplia pontos de acesso de assunto aos registros bibliográficos na recuperação desses conteúdos por outros termos diferentes da representação de forma "literatura de ficção". A investigação sobre indexação de obras de ficção tem como objetivo o relato da avaliação e adequação do Modelo para Indexação de Ficção (MENTIF) realizada por pesquisadores e catalogadores. Para isso foram realizadas quatro etapas de avaliação que incluíram análise de registros bibliográficos e aplicação de questionários para levantamento de dados sobre satisfação e insatisfação. Os resultados obtidos proporcionaram a adequação do MENTIF conforme estratégias cognitivas e sociocognitivas dos profissionais catalogadores e em função da restrição de tempo para a tarefa. KEYWORDS Indexing methodology Works of fiction University libraries ABSTRACTThe Indexing of works of fiction to libraries catalogs requires an appropriate methodology linked to the textual structure of fiction narratives. The lack of an indexing methodology limits the representation and retrieval of subjects in the catalog. The methodological proposal of the Fiction Indexing Model (MENTIF) increases subject access points to the bibliographic records in the retrieval of these contents by other terms other than "fiction literature" representation. The research on indexing of works of fiction has as its objective to adjust the Model for Fiction Indexing (MENTIF) performed by researchers and catalogers. For this purpose, four evaluation stages were carried out, which included analysis of bibliographic records and the application of questionnaires to collect data regarding satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The results obtained allowed an adjustment of the MENTIF in accordance with the time restriction for the task as well as considering the catalogers cognitive and socio-cognitive strategies.

show abstract

Section: Indexação De Obras De Ficção E O Modelo Metodológicounclassified

Indexação de obras de ficção em bibliotecas universitárias: avaliação e adequação do Modelo para indexação de ficção (MENTIF)

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Beghtol (1995) used quantitative techniques to create a composite statistical picture of the subject field of periodical literature about fiction. Saarti (2000) and Albrechtsen and Pejtersen (2003) are examples of qualitative approaches.…”

Section: Empirical Analysis For Category Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance works: Continuing to comprehend instantiation

Smiraglia

2011

nasko

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much work in knowledge organization (KO) is conceptual, which results in a theoretical framework that is itself largely conceptual. In some cases empirical methods have been employed as well for direct observation of phenomena. Direct observation provides a critical base point and a variety of empirical approaches have been used to good effect in KO. The phenomenon of instantiation has been examined to date almost entirely based on the analysis of data derived from empirical analysis. In the present paper we demonstrate the efficacy of the empirical model for category generation by taking one category of instantiation-the performance work-and submitting it to analytical scrutiny. Data from three analytical studies are reviewed and placed alongside evidence from datasets gathered for prior studies on instantiation. A performance work is realized in space and time, and thus exists spatiotemporally. The performance work might be derived from a precedent work, related to other works that are embedded, have adjunct documentation, and be accompanied by antecedent works. A naïve classification is derived empirically, a model follows rationally, and together with semiotic elements a partial typology is generated that represents the essential knowledge elements from which a KO schema for performance works might evolve.

show abstract

“…Thereafter the notion of the literary warrant has become focal in the discussion on KO [34][35] [36], although the precise view on its essential meaning has varied from one author to another [86]. In spite of some critique, the concept of 'warrant' has been adopted widely as a practicable concept to denote the intellectual criteria of KO [37] (Fig.…”

Section: Warrantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological framework of information interactions and information infrastructures

Huvila

2009

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been notably little convergence between information organisation and information use studies. A framework for explicating the contextual interplay of information interactions and infrastructures of information, and more specifically the interface of information work and knowledge organisation systems is proposed. The theoretical foundations of the framework are based on systems theory and ecological approach. It is suggested that the interplay of information use and information infrastructures may be conceptualised as a systemic interaction, which is driven by the simultaneous influence of human activity related warrants and infrastructural affordances and constraints. The model provides an instrument that explicates the interplay of human information use and information infrastructures.Keywords: Information interactions, information work, knowledge organisation, knowledge organisation systems, information infrastructures, ecological approach IntroductionThe polarities of information science research are a widely discussed issue [6]. One reason for this still prevailing state of affairs can be argued to be the lack of common frame of reference in terms of theories and scholarly orientation towards institutions, documentation and information [7]. Information systems have been able to meet only some information work and use related problems and the results of information use studies have proven difficult to operationalise in systems design.The latter gap has been discussed relatively seldom in explicit theoretical terms. Steinerová [8] maps the human issues of information seeking and knowledge organisation (KO) and Abbott [9] discusses the general issue of subjectivity. Given and Olson [10] use data on information behaviour as a basis for constructing KO. The

show abstract

Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies

Cited by 41 publications

References 5 publications

Indexação de obras de ficção em bibliotecas universitárias: avaliação e adequação do Modelo para indexação de ficção (MENTIF)

Indexação de obras de ficção em bibliotecas universitárias: avaliação e adequação do Modelo para indexação de ficção (MENTIF)

Performance works: Continuing to comprehend instantiation

Ecological framework of information interactions and information infrastructures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About