2002
DOI: 10.1107/s0907444902009599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain closure and action of uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG): structures of new crystal forms containing the Escherichia coli enzyme and a comparative study of the known structures involving UDG

Abstract: The structures of a new crystal form of free Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), containing four molecules in the asymmetric unit, and two forms of its complex with the proteinaceous inhibitor Ugi, containing two and four crystallographically independent complexes, have been determined. A comparison of these structures and the already known crystal structures containing UDG shows that the enzyme can be considered to be made up of two independently moving structural entities or domains. A detailed st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They remove uracil, formed as a result of deamination of cytosine [33] or mis-incorporated during replication [34], from DNA. The drUNG structure was determined to a resolution of 1.8 Å [28] and showed high similarity to previously determined structures of human [35], herpes simplex virus [36], E. coli [37] and Atlantic cod [38] UNGs. However, drUNG was shown to possess a very high catalytic efficiency on uracil containing substrate (mainly U:A and U:G base pairs) compared to human UNG, which was attributed to a high substrate affinity caused by a cluster of positively charged residues close to the DNA binding site [28].…”
Section: Base Excision Repairsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…They remove uracil, formed as a result of deamination of cytosine [33] or mis-incorporated during replication [34], from DNA. The drUNG structure was determined to a resolution of 1.8 Å [28] and showed high similarity to previously determined structures of human [35], herpes simplex virus [36], E. coli [37] and Atlantic cod [38] UNGs. However, drUNG was shown to possess a very high catalytic efficiency on uracil containing substrate (mainly U:A and U:G base pairs) compared to human UNG, which was attributed to a high substrate affinity caused by a cluster of positively charged residues close to the DNA binding site [28].…”
Section: Base Excision Repairsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…At the moment of writing this review, the Protein Data Bank held 43 structures of UNG enzymes from human [21,2330], Atlantic cod [31,32], Leischmania naiffi (Larson et al, to be published), E. coli [3338], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [39], Deinococcus radiodurans [40], Vibrio cholerae (Raeder et al, to be published), herpes simplex virus 1 [22,41,42], Epstein–Barr virus [43] and vaccinia virus [44], either free or complexed with Ura, dUrd, various ss- and ds oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs), and inhibitors, both naturally occurring (Ugi protein of PBS bacteriophages) and designed small molecules. Since the general structures of all these proteins and features of their interaction with DNA are quite similar, it makes sense to consider all UNG proteins as minor variations of a single structural system.…”
Section: Structural Aspects Of Lesion Search and Recognition By Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have determined that the mechanism for uracil repairing by UDGs in diverse organisms included the displacement of the uracil lesion to an extrahelical position and the insertion into the DNA base stack of the side chain of a protruding leucine (Leu272 in Hs UDG, Leu191 in Ec UDG) located at UDG loop V (14,38,45). Interestingly, our analysis revealed that the main feature of the Bs UDG-p56 complex formation is the recognition of the Phe191 residue from Bs UDG by a specific hydrophobic pocket at the p56 dimer interface (Figure 7B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to model the Bs UDG-DNA complex, Bs UDG coordinates were separated in two domains [domain I (8–79; 120–154) and domain II (80–111; 159–225], as their equivalent domains in several UDG isoforms are reported to close on DNA binding (38). Each domain was superposed to Hs UDG (50% sequence identity), as obtained in complex with DNA (pdb code 1emh).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%