Dominating Risk Impositions

Maheshwari, Kritika; Nyholm, Sven

doi:10.1007/s10892-022-09407-4

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Ethical Criteria For Coercive Public Health Measures1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article6

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For other ethical reflections see the following papers on: selective lockdowns of the elderly (Savulescu and Cameron, 2020); the alternative of mandatory contact tracing (White and van Basshuysen, 2020); the nature of freedom in the trade-off between freedom and health (Giubilini, 2023); 'dominating risk impositions' (Maheshwari and Nyholm, 2022), and on fairness in restricting liberty in the interests of security (Cullity, 2021).…”

Section: Ethical Criteria For Coercive Public Health Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law, Ethics and Lockdowns: Impacts on Life, Liberty and the Economy

Keown,

Paton

2024

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Ethical Criteria For Coercive Public Health Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law, Ethics and Lockdowns: Impacts on Life, Liberty and the Economy

Keown,

Paton

2024

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

LLMs beyond the lab: the ethics and epistemics of real-world AI research

Mollen

2024

Ethics Inf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Values in public health: an argument from trust

Popa

2024

Synthese

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on the role of values in science and objectivity has typically approached trust through its epistemic aspects. Yet, recent work on public trust in science has emphasized the role of non-epistemic values in building and maintaining trust. This paper will use a concept of trust that adds concerns about justice to epistemic conditions to investigate this problem in relation to public health. I will argue that trust-conducive values, particularly justice, are relevant in deciding which value influences are legitimate in scientific decision-making. Drawing on public health ethics, I will provide a consequentialist justification for employing trust-conducive values. While several concepts of justice have been explored in the context of public health, I will further draw on public health ethics, focusing on a view that brings together both distributive and procedural aspects. For illustration, I will use the case of cardiovascular disease prevention, particularly how concerns about justice apply when choosing between population-based and individual-based approaches.

show abstract

Dominating Risk Impositions

Cited by 7 publications

References 34 publications

Law, Ethics and Lockdowns: Impacts on Life, Liberty and the Economy

Law, Ethics and Lockdowns: Impacts on Life, Liberty and the Economy

LLMs beyond the lab: the ethics and epistemics of real-world AI research

Values in public health: an argument from trust

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About