Dorsal midline incision: A versatile technique for correction of meatal stenosis during hypospadias repair

Abstract

Objectives: To our knowledge, the incidence of congenital meatal abnormalities associated with hypospadias varies from 9.6% to 31%, of which meatal stenosis is the most common, affecting 9.1–16.7% of patients. Traditionally, meatal stenosis has been dealt with by meatal dilatation, although ventral meatotomy until the normal urethra is encountered has also been used. Here, we report the outcome of a technique where, during hypospadias repair, a dorsal midline incision was performed instead of a ventral urethral incision, starting at the narrow meatus and subsequently extending proximally to treat the meatal stenosis. Methods: Patients having distal hypospadias with meatal stenosis were included in this study. In this technique, a dorsal midline incision was extended until normal calibre urethra was encountered. Patients with chordee >15°, proximal hypospadias, redo cases, glans width <14 mm, where separation of the skin from the underlying urethra was not possible and with a follow-up of less than three months were excluded from the study. A total of 73 patients were operated on using this technique. Results were assessed with regards to urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) and stricture formation. Results: Five (6.85%) patients developed UCF: one (5%) in the subcoronal group, two (8.0%) in the distal penile group and two (14.3%) in the mid-penile hypospadias group. Postoperatively, only one patient had meatal stenosis. Conclusion: We think hypospadiac meatal stenosis is best treated by a dorsal midline incision, as it does not lead to a proximal shift of the meatus, and this defect heals by re-epithelisation without significant scarring, which in turn decreases the possibility of UCF. That is why the fistula rate in our study was 6.85%, which is lower than in various published series. Level of evidence: XXX