PsycEXTRA Dataset 2014
DOI: 10.1037/e528942014-096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Jeopardy in Inferring Cognitive Processes

Abstract: Inferences we make about underlying cognitive processes can be jeopardized in two ways due to problematic forms of aggregation. First, averaging across individuals is typically considered a very useful tool for removing random variability. The threat is that averaging across subjects leads to averaging across different cognitive strategies, thus harming our inferences. The second threat comes from the construction of inadequate research designs possessing a low diagnostic accuracy of cognitive processes. For t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 62 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?