Shock Waves @ Marseille III 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-78835-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag Coefficient Measurement of Spheres in a Vertical Shock Tube and Numerical Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is not clear which correlation performs better, it is evident that compressibility, or Mach number of the induced flow, correlates well with the increased drag coefficients. The current results are therefore supportive of the argument that the increased drag coefficients of spheres having low acceleration parameters reported in previous shock tube studies [21,[28][29][30][31] can be attributed to compressibility rather than flow unsteadiness. Other factors may play a role as well in some experiments, such as freestream turbulence levels or particle roughness or asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussion Of Single-particle Dragsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it is not clear which correlation performs better, it is evident that compressibility, or Mach number of the induced flow, correlates well with the increased drag coefficients. The current results are therefore supportive of the argument that the increased drag coefficients of spheres having low acceleration parameters reported in previous shock tube studies [21,[28][29][30][31] can be attributed to compressibility rather than flow unsteadiness. Other factors may play a role as well in some experiments, such as freestream turbulence levels or particle roughness or asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussion Of Single-particle Dragsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When applied to unsteady flows, apparent discrepancies arise. A number of studies have measured higher values of C D for an unsteady flow than would be predicted by a standard drag model [21,[28][29][30][31]. In such cases, unsteadiness refers to the acceleration of a particle at rest when subjected to the flow behind a shock wave, or the deceleration of a particle in a ballistic test.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where µ is the viscosity of the gas, which was evaluated by using Sutherland's formula. The recent experimental results of Igra and Takayama (1993) and of Rodriguez et al (1995) as well as the standard drag curves proposed by Morsi and Alexander (1972) for Re < 50 000, by White (1986) for Re > 50 000 and by Henderson (1976) are also shown in figure 5.…”
Section: Drag Coefficient Measurementmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This in turn allows the present investigations to cover both subsonic and supersonic post-shock flow cases. As was done in previous experiments (Igra & Takayama 1993;Rodriguez et al 1993;Suzuki et al 1999), here too the sphere drag coefficient, C D , was deduced from its trajectory. To obtain an accurate reconstruction of the investigated sphere's trajectory, the windows in the presently used test section had a field of view of 80!300 mm (300 mm in the flow direction).…”
Section: Experimental Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Later, Rodriguez et al (1993) investigated both the steady and unsteady drag coefficients of a sphere initially free-falling in a vertical shock tube, using a rapid camera shadowgraph technique. Their work investigated the drag coefficient of a sphere, but, in each experiment, 20-30 particles were dropped down the vertical shock tube in order to ensure that at least one of them would be present in the field of view during its interaction with the incident shock wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%