Driving and Community Integration After Traumatic Brain Injury

Rapport, Lisa J.; Bryer, Renee Coleman; Hanks, Robin A.

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.009

Cited by 97 publications

(103 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The independent variables were selected with reference to past literature (13,18,19). In addition, considering the effect of multicollinearity, a correlation matrix was established before analysis, and the variance inflation factor (VIF) was calculated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Predictors of track test performance in drivers with stroke

Kobayashi

Omokute²,

Mitsuyama³

et al. 2016

Turkish Neurosurgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We used multivariate analysis to identify predictors of track test performance from the results of neuropsychological tests. (18,19), and Useful Field of View test (UFOV) (1,5). Based on the results of these Receiver Operating Characteristic curve.…”

Section: Driving Simulatormentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors of track test performance in drivers with stroke

Kobayashi

Omokute²,

Mitsuyama³

et al. 2016

Turkish Neurosurgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Five studies (Coleman, et al, 2002;Formisano, et al, 2005;Pietrapiana, et al, 2005;Rapport, Bryer, & Hanks, 2008;Schneider & Gouvier, 2005) attempted to determine whether certain variables were associated with risk of crash/driving offenses among patients with TBI. Evidence for an association between any TBI-related factor and risk of crash/driving offenses was mixed.…”

Section: Factors Associated With Traumatic Brain Injuries That Are Prmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traumatic Brain Injury and Driver Safety: A Systematic Review

Tregear

Williams

Funmilayo

2011

Proceedings of the 6th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design : Dr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary: Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) can lead to impairments in cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functions, which may ultimately affect an individual's ability to drive. A systematic review was conducted to: 1) assess the impact of TBI on crash risk/driving performance; 2) determine what factors associated with TBI are predictive of increased crash risk/poor driving performance; and 3) determine if there is a likelihood of future seizure among individuals with a TBI who did not experience a seizure at the time of the injury. Results indicated that: 1) The available evidence is insufficient to determine whether crash risk is elevated for drivers with TBI compared to uninjured controls (Summary RR=1.32;

show abstract

“…There is a substantial focus on returning to driving in the ABI literature and the majority of research has examined the processes, predictors and assessment of safe return to driving (Aslaksen, Orbo, Elvestad, Schafer, & Anke, 2013;Bottari, Lamothe, Gosselin, Gelinas, & Ptito, 2012;Ortoleva, Brugger, Van der Linden, & Walder, 2012). In one study of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), 48% of non-drivers expressed a strong desire to return to driving (Rapport, Bryer, & Hanks, 2008). However driving may not be a realistic goal for at least 30% of people with ABI .…”

Section: Background and Significance Of Thesis "There Are Just Four Kmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However driving may not be a realistic goal for at least 30% of people with ABI . Family members thus struggle with balancing the individual's safety with their goal of independence and maintenance of a positive self-identity (Rapport et al, 2008).…”

Section: Background and Significance Of Thesis "There Are Just Four Kmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family members’ needs and experiences related to driving disruption following acquired brain injury

Liang¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Family members often assume the caregiving role after an individual sustains an acquired brain injury (ABI). A mandated period of driving disruption following an ABI means that individuals will often rely heavily on family members for transport and emotional support.However, research on driving disruption has largely focused on the impact, assessment and rehabilitation of the individual with ABI, with little attention given to family members. In order to develop an understanding for approaches to support family members better, this thesis aimed to explore the needs and experiences of family members during driving disruption following an ABI.The first aim of the thesis was to gain a broader understanding of the issue by conducting a scoping review of the literature on family members' needs and experiences during driving disruption across all health conditions. The scoping review found that driving disruption is a stressful and complex issue with communication and emotional implications for family members. The review highlighted differences in experiences according to health condition, permanence of driving disruption and nature of the caregiver occupation, and identified the need for further research on the issue of driving disruption for family members of individuals with ABI.A prospective, mixed methods, longitudinal study, with a phenomenological approach was conducted with family members of individuals with ABI who were experiencing driving disruption. Recruitment was stratified according to time post-ABI to gain a range of perspectives. Data were collected from 15 family members at three time-points: recruitment to study, 3 and 6 months later. Self-report questionnaires measuring family members' quality of life and well-being were administered at the first time-point, and semistructured interviews were conducted at each time-point. All interviews incorporated the use of a map to elicit qualitative and quantitative data about family members' current travel patterns as a result of driving disruption. The data were analysed using different approaches in a series of four studies.The first two studies aimed to gain an in-depth understanding about the experiences of family members of individuals experiencing driving disruption due to ABI across the recovery continuum. Both studies examined the mixed methods cross-sectional data from the first time-point. The first study explored the differences in family members' experiences iii at the early (<1 year post-ABI) and later stages (>1 year post-ABI) using a mixed methods, phenomenological approach. Family members in the later group reported more challenges with greater intensity. These challenges included changes in everyday activities, the impact on their emotions, consequences for the whole family, and effects on physical health. The later group had lower ratings of health and well-being, and higher caregiver strain.The second study investigated the specific changes family members experienced in everyday activities with a focus on the impact of driving disru...

show abstract

Driving and Community Integration After Traumatic Brain Injury

Cited by 97 publications

References 41 publications

Predictors of track test performance in drivers with stroke

Predictors of track test performance in drivers with stroke

Traumatic Brain Injury and Driver Safety: A Systematic Review

Family members’ needs and experiences related to driving disruption following acquired brain injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About