2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drought matters – Declining precipitation influences growth of Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. in north-eastern Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

28
168
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
28
168
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Friedrichs et al 2009;Scharnweber et al 2011) and precipitation might have increased at site SW: in contrast to the former statement about the sites that no significant differences appear across the valley (Geßler et al 2001), measured precipitation at site SW-C from 2001 to 2007 was higher than at NE-C (1,027 compared to 865 mm annual average). During the simulation period, the driest year was 2003 that has been shown to decrease carbon assimilation in Europe in general (Ciais et al 2005) and for beech in particular (Charru et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Friedrichs et al 2009;Scharnweber et al 2011) and precipitation might have increased at site SW: in contrast to the former statement about the sites that no significant differences appear across the valley (Geßler et al 2001), measured precipitation at site SW-C from 2001 to 2007 was higher than at NE-C (1,027 compared to 865 mm annual average). During the simulation period, the driest year was 2003 that has been shown to decrease carbon assimilation in Europe in general (Ciais et al 2005) and for beech in particular (Charru et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Beech and oak form pure and mixed stands, but productivity of mixed beech-oak forests might be superior to pure stands depending on site conditions , and the importance of mixed stands might increase with the consequences of climate changes . However, the future status of beech and oak forests affected by climate changes remains unclear and it is currently under intensive debate (Geßler et al, 2006;Kramer et al, 2010;Czucz et al, 2011;Scharnweber et al, 2011;Mette et al, 2013;Zimmermann et al, 2015). Succession from oak-to beech-dominated forest stands is often observed (Rohner et al, 2012;Petritan et al, 2014), but this process is usually long and complex, involving a variable pattern of competition for light, moisture and nutrient resources at the stage of regeneration, but also a variable pattern of mortality of senescent individuals (Vera et al, 2006;Bontemps et al, 2012;Ligot et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of beech radial growth at a yearly basis confirmed that frequent and intense growth reductions go along with a decreasing growth trend. The exceptionally hot and dry growing season of 1976 [29,63] could be considered as a transitional year ( Figure 6). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%