1992
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139172578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drugs and Rights

Abstract: When writing can change your life, when writing can enrich you by offering much money, why don't you try it? Are you still very confused of where getting the ideas? Do you still have no idea with what you are going to write? Now, you will need reading. A good writer is a good reader at once. You can define how you write depending on what books to read. This drugs and rights can help you to solve the problem. It can be one of the right sources to develop your writing skill.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…at noen yrkesgrupper, på grunnlag av ulike vurderinger, mener at de vet hva som er til beste for den enkelte bruker uavhengig av hva brukerne selv måtte mene (jf. Nilssen 2005Nilssen , 2001Aasen 2000;Husak 1992;Eriksen 1988: Dworkin 1972. Dermed kan det også vaere viktig å sikre den enkelte borgers rettigheter i forhold til ulike velferdsprofesjoner gjennom rettslig regulering.…”
Section: Rettslig Regulering Og Faglig Skjønnsutøvelseunclassified
“…at noen yrkesgrupper, på grunnlag av ulike vurderinger, mener at de vet hva som er til beste for den enkelte bruker uavhengig av hva brukerne selv måtte mene (jf. Nilssen 2005Nilssen , 2001Aasen 2000;Husak 1992;Eriksen 1988: Dworkin 1972. Dermed kan det også vaere viktig å sikre den enkelte borgers rettigheter i forhold til ulike velferdsprofesjoner gjennom rettslig regulering.…”
Section: Rettslig Regulering Og Faglig Skjønnsutøvelseunclassified
“…The liberal critique of the over-criminalization created by the drug laws has been made convincingly again and again (Szasz, 1996;Husak, 1992); further, the fact that these laws do not work on empirical grounds, causing more harms than they ameliorate, has been repeatedly shown, to little effect (Transform, 2014). Thus it is clear that legal moralism needs to be directly addressed, the more authentically moral position of liberalism -enshrined in human rights legislation -brought to the fore.…”
Section: Qualified To Thinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the law did not decriminalize drugs, no one should be prosecuted for possession of small amounts of any drug for personal use. The moral and political arguments for the right to consume what a competent adult chooses are too powerful (e.g., Husak 1992Husak , 2002.…”
Section: Criticism Of Current Legal Regulation Of Addictionmentioning
confidence: 99%