Dual carbon goals and the impact on future agricultural development in China: a general equilibrium analysis

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the future path of agricultural development in China toward 2060 under the dual carbon goals, so as to inform better policy choices for facilitating agricultural and rural transformation toward the goal of maintaining food security, sustainable income growth and low carbon emission.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a single-country, multi-sectoral computable general equilibrium model, CHINAGEM model and develops eight illustrative scenarios to simulate the impacts of attaining dual carbon goals on agricultural development in China. Additional two scenarios have also been designed to inform better policy making with the aim to offset the negative impact of the decarbonization schemes through facilitating agricultural technology progress.FindingsDual carbon goals are projected to impose substantial negative impact on agricultural productions and consumptions in China in the coming four decades. Under the assumption of business as usual, agricultural production will reduce by 0.49–8.94% along with the attainment of carbon neutrality goal by 2060, with the production of cereals and high-value being more severely damaged. To mitigate the adverse impact of the decarbonization schemes, it is believed that fastening technology progress in agriculture is one of the most efficient ways for maintaining domestic food security without harming the dual carbon goals. In particular, if agricultural productivity (particularly, for cereals and high-value products) can be increased by another 1% per year, the production losses caused by carbon emission mitigation will be fully offset. This implies that promoting technology progress is still the best way to facilitate agricultural development and rural transformation in future China.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature in better informing the impact of dual carbon goals on China's agriculture and the effectiveness of technology progress in agriculture on buffering the adverse impact of the decarbonization schemes and promoting agricultural development.

How to promote China's green economic development? The combination effects of consumption tax and carbon tax policies

“…During previous studies, many fields use the CGE model widely, including international trade, 61,67 fiscal and taxation, 48,68 energy and environment, 9,69 income distribution, 70,71 regional economic issues, 20,41 traffic and transport, 72,73 agricultural development, 74,75 tourism industry, 76,77 post-disaster economic reconstruction and so on. 58,78 This article's multisectoral dynamic CGE model arose from the Analysis of Chinese Economic Systems Simulation (ACESS) model of the Numerical Intelligence Economic Systems Simulation Research Centre, 79 consisting of a production module, an income and expenditure module, a trading module, and a carbon tax module, along with a dynamic and macro closure module.…”

Towards a Win-Win Solution for Dietary Health and Carbon Reduction—Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta in China

“…Wei et al explored the future path of agricultural development in China toward 2060 under a dual carbon goal. The authors maintained that hastening the technological progress in agriculture is one of the most efficient ways to maintain domestic food security [17]. In addition, respondents on high-GHG diets had higher intake levels of saturated fats and sodium, as well as lower quality diets [18,19].…”

Legal Countermeasures for Chinas Dual Carbon Goals in the Post-pandemic

“…On the one hand, a perfect participation mechanism should be established to ensure the legality of policy formulation with legal rights and obligations and procedures. On the other hand, in terms of the specialization of environmental justice, the scope of accepting cases should be gradually expanded from pollution prevention to climate change [8].…”