2004
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00368.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual constrictor and dilator actions of ETB receptors in the rat renal microcirculation: interactions with ETA receptors

Abstract: The vascular actions of endothelin-1 (ET-1) reflect the combination of vasoconstrictor ETA and ETB receptors on smooth muscle cells and vasodilator ETB receptors on endothelial cells. The present study investigated the contribution of ET receptor subtypes using a comprehensive battery of agonists and antagonists infused directly into the renal artery of anesthetized rats to evaluate the actions of each receptor class alone and their interactions. ET-1 (5 pmol) reduced renal blood flow (RBF) 25 Ϯ 1%. ETA antago… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
69
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, kidney blood flow was reduced to a similar level as that in tumours (despite a somewhat different time course), suggesting that vasoconstriction in kidney is mediated primarily through the ET B receptor. This was also suggested by Just et al (2004), although there is also evidence for some involvement of ET A receptors (Matsuura et al 1996;Ozawa et al 2003). In the present study, the response of small intestine to IRL 1620 was also vasoconstrictive, again indicating that the predominant responsive ET B receptors in this tissue are on contractile elements of the blood vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In the current study, kidney blood flow was reduced to a similar level as that in tumours (despite a somewhat different time course), suggesting that vasoconstriction in kidney is mediated primarily through the ET B receptor. This was also suggested by Just et al (2004), although there is also evidence for some involvement of ET A receptors (Matsuura et al 1996;Ozawa et al 2003). In the present study, the response of small intestine to IRL 1620 was also vasoconstrictive, again indicating that the predominant responsive ET B receptors in this tissue are on contractile elements of the blood vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Activation of ET B receptor with selective agonists such as sarafotoxin 6c produced transient depressor response followed by a longer pressor phase (7). Similarly, BQ3020, an ET B agonist, is a potent constrictor of renal and mesenteric vasculature beds (21). Based on these contradictory results, it is widely believed that the endothelial ET B receptor mediates dilatation and the smooth muscle cell ET B receptor mediates constriction (6,19,37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is possible to assume that nonselective blockade not only reduces deleterious effects of ET A receptor blockade but is detrimental due to blockade of beneficial vasorelaxant actions of ET B receptors, which is mediated through the release of nitric oxide and prostaglandins. 39 The question is even more complicated because, first, 2 distinct ET B receptors were identified 40,41 (ET B1 present on vascular endothelium cause vasodilation whereas ET B2 on vascular smooth muscle cells mediate vasoconstriction) and, second, different actions of these receptors are reported in various species 40,42,43 (in contrary to other species, Brooks found no ET B2 -mediated vasoconstriction in dogs). Moreover, Just et al 41 speculated that not only dual (constrictor and dilator) actions of ET B receptors have to be considered but also interactions with ET A receptors evaluating their physiological function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%