2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2005.00226.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Pain: Preliminary Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A few preliminary studies of a new dual lead SCS system concluded that it is able to provide low back and paresthesia coverage. The results were not similar to data indicating that dual stimulation does not offer advantages with respect to conventional, single electrode array stimulation [3950]. …”
Section: Evidences For Scs Effectiveness In Fbsscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few preliminary studies of a new dual lead SCS system concluded that it is able to provide low back and paresthesia coverage. The results were not similar to data indicating that dual stimulation does not offer advantages with respect to conventional, single electrode array stimulation [3950]. …”
Section: Evidences For Scs Effectiveness In Fbsscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The most common reported complication was lead migration (15%–28% when traditional SCS was used and 2%–2.5% when new SCS techniques were used), followed by local wound infection, pocket pain, loss of therapeutic effect, or CSF leak with headache [3940414243]. …”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it showed a wide discrepancy between the two indicators. Review of the literature reveals that practically all studies showed a higher number of patients with >50% patient satisfaction than >50% pain relief (27,45–48). This may be explained by the fact that VAS scores were used to assess pain relief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of such an approach is an increased cost of the procedure, trial, and implantation, due to the use of an extra lead and an increase in the duration of the operative procedure. Even with dual leads, the rate of migration requiring revision was 8–25% (48,55,56). Our previous study, with a 4‐contact lead, showed that the “midline anchoring” technique decreased migration of the lead, lowering the revision rate to 7% (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los españoles hemos participado desde los inicios de estas técnicas quirúrgicas en el desarrollo y aplicación de las mismas, tanto en las técnicas de estimulación eléctrica medular como en la de infusión espinal de medicamentos 1,7,[15][16][17]23,42,[88][89][90]116 . Recientemente, se han publicado nuevos estudios que corroboran todos los resultados publicados a lo largo de casi 30 años en el campo del manejo del dolor crónico y, donde como ya mencioné anteriormente, los españoles, hemos participado activamente tanto clínica como experimentalmente 24,61,95,112 .…”
Section: Neuromodulación Medularunclassified