2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual stage PRO process for power generation from different feed resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dual stage PRO process has been initially proposed for power generation using different feed sources [12]. However, the process applications can be extended to maximize power generation from a vast osmotic gradient resource such as highly concentrated ionic solution and Dead Sea water.…”
Section: High Performance Dual Stage Pro Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dual stage PRO process has been initially proposed for power generation using different feed sources [12]. However, the process applications can be extended to maximize power generation from a vast osmotic gradient resource such as highly concentrated ionic solution and Dead Sea water.…”
Section: High Performance Dual Stage Pro Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the open-loop dual stage PRO process, Dead Sea brine and seawater (TDS between 32 and 50 g/L) were used as the draw and feed solutions respectively. The impact of feed solution salinity, and operational parameters such as hydraulic pressure on the PRO performance was evaluated using a predeveloped model [12,13]. High water flux across the PRO membrane results in concentrative and dilutive concentration polarizations, respectively, at the feed and draw solution sides of the membrane [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-stage PRO configuration is demonstrated to reduce the irreversible energy losses and increase the energy harvesting efficiency. Very recently, a dual stage PRO process is proposed and experimentally studied by Altaee et al [37]. The experimental results showed that the power generation in the dual PRO process was higher than that in the conventional PRO process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was found that the configurations of the continuous draw and continuous feed solution (CDCF) and the continuous draw and divided feed solution (CDDF) were more beneficial than for single-stage PRO processes. The performance of two dual-stage PRO processes was also evaluated by Altaee and Hilal under two different configurations, denoted as an old dual-stage design and a new dual-stage design [64,65]. The difference between the two designs was the partial (old dual stage) or entire (new dual stage) utilization of seawater flow from the first PRO stage, which resulted in a 17.4% increase in the power density achieved with the new design.…”
Section: Numerical Studies Regarding Promentioning
confidence: 99%