Duplicate Publication in the Field of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery

Bailey, Byron J.

doi:10.1067/mhn.2002.122698

Cited by 77 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A study of one year's publications in three general surgical journals showed that nearly 14% were duplicate or salami sliced publications 21 . Similar results have been found in an orthopaedic journal and in ENT 3,10 . Checking of references sometimes shows that arguments are supported by references to other publications which are in fact not supportive.…”

supporting

confidence: 89%

Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research

Illingworth¹

2005

Neurocirugía

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

supporting

confidence: 89%

Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research

Illingworth¹

2005

Neurocirugía

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…publication in different languages and with clear cross references). 22,23 This might be the case found in the second instance (the article was initially published in a journal in Spanish and later the article was published in English), but the authors failed to declare the cross reference. It is possible that in the first case the authors wanted to increase visibility (the article was initially published in a SciELO-indexed journal and later it was published in a MEDLINEindexed journal).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…28 Significant efforts should be made to educate authors, particularly young academicians, to avoid the practice of duplicate publication. 22,27 One limitation of the study is that we studied only the theses at one private university in Peru. Therefore, our results can not be generalised to all medical schools in Peru.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As Bailey mentioned: 'The act of submission infers that the manuscript should be published because the information is not available elsewhere and because it is significant'. 22 Many institutions are storing theses and dissertations in university repositories, which might be considered 'published' in one sense. 25 We might have a duplicate publication problem if journals take a very strict approach to duplicate publication.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Characteristics and publication patterns of theses from a Peruvian medical school

Arriola-Quiroz

Curioso

Cruz-Encarnación

et al. 2010

Health Info Libraries J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Many medical schools require a student thesis before graduation. Publishing results in a peer-reviewed journal could be an indicator of scientific value and acceptability by the scientific community. The publication pattern of theses published by medical students in Peru is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and publication pattern of theses in biomedical-indexed journals conducted by medical students in a university with the highest research output in Peru. Methods: Data from registered theses between 2000 and 2003 were obtained from the university library. Publication of theses in biomedical journals was assessed in 2008 by a search strategy using PubMed, Google Scholar, LILACS, LIPECS and SciELO. Results: Four hundred and eighty-two medical theses were registered between 2000 and 2003; 85 (17.6%) were published in biomedical-indexed journals. Of the published theses, 28 (5.8%) were published in MEDLINE-indexed journals, 55 (11.4%) in SciELO-indexed journals, 61 (12.6%) in LILACS-indexed journals and 68 (14.1%) in LIPECS-indexed journals. Most of the published theses (80%) were in Spanish and published in Peruvian journals; and 17 theses (20%) were published in foreign journals (all of them indexed in MEDLINE). In addition, 37 (43.5%) belong primarily to internal medicine, and 24 (28.2%) belong primarily to infectious diseases. Medical students were first authors in 71 (83.5%) of the articles. Conclusion: In this study, most of the published theses were in Spanish, published in local journals and indexed in LIPECS. The percentage of published theses in biomedical journals at this university is comparable with others coming from developed countries.

show abstract

“…These include plagiarism (Braumoeller, 2001;Monostori, 2002;Cook, 2002;Hoad, 2003;Gilbert, 2003;Pecorari, 2003;Chen, 2004;Bao, 2004), duplicate/ redundant publication (Doherty, 1996;Jefferson, 1998;Schein, 2001;Bailey, 2002;Von Elm, 2004;Mojon-Azzi, 2004;Gwilym, 2004), text/ document clustering (Maderlechner, 1997;Atlam, 2003;Dobrynin, 2004;Shin, 2004;Bansal, 2004), and information retrieval (Salton, 1991;Hui, 2004;Leuski, 2004;Muresan, 2004;Chang, 2004). These studies have shown that, in general, identifying similar documents through concept matching is quite difficult.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%