2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durvalumab consolidation in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer with driver genomic alterations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several retrospective studies have also demonstrated smaller benefits of durvalumab consolidation in EGFR positive NSCLC compared to wild‐type patients following chemoradiation 30,31 . Recently, a multicenter retrospective analysis involving 323 stage III NSCLC patients across Europe and America reported limited activity of consolidation durvalumab in those harboring EGFR mutation, BRAF mutation and ALK rearrangement, but not for those harboring KRAS mutation 32 . In our study, both EGFR ‐mutation positive and WT patients had longer PFS and OS with durvalumab consolidation compared to CCRT alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective studies have also demonstrated smaller benefits of durvalumab consolidation in EGFR positive NSCLC compared to wild‐type patients following chemoradiation 30,31 . Recently, a multicenter retrospective analysis involving 323 stage III NSCLC patients across Europe and America reported limited activity of consolidation durvalumab in those harboring EGFR mutation, BRAF mutation and ALK rearrangement, but not for those harboring KRAS mutation 32 . In our study, both EGFR ‐mutation positive and WT patients had longer PFS and OS with durvalumab consolidation compared to CCRT alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 A multicentre retrospective analysis (n ¼ 323, driver mutation cohort n ¼ 17) showed a median PFSdcounted from the start of durvalumabdof 9 months in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and w8 months in patients with either BRAF V600E mutation or ALK alterations. 80,81 A multiinstitutional retrospective analysis (n ¼ 37) showed no statistically significant benefit in patients with EGFR mutation treated with durvalumab after CCRT compared with placebo. In addition, 40% of patients suspended durvalumab due to severe irAEs.…”
Section: Immunotherapy In Patients With Stage III Nsclc Harboring Dri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a multicenter retrospective study showed limited activity in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC with driver genomic alterations treated with durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) after chemoradiotherapy, especially in the ALK rearrangement subgroup. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (11.3-NR) in the KRAS-mutation vs. 8.1 month in the EGFR-mutation vs. 7.8 month in the BRAF-mutation/ALK rearrangement (P = 0.02) ( 57 ). Therefore, current research on ALK-positive patients has mainly focused on ALK inhibitor resistance ( 58 ).…”
Section: Current Landscape Of Immunotherapy Of Alk-altered Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%