Dust emission and dispersion from mineral storage piles

Abstract

Dust pollution is a complex problem of growing interest because of its environmental, health, economic and political impact. Environmental impact assessment methods for dust pollution management are often based on the simulation of dust dispersion, which requires a precise characterization of the source term and of the source parameters. The source term model should be as simple and as accurate as possible and requires low time consumption in order to be easily connected to a more complex algorithm for the dispersion calculations. This work focuses on dust emissions from mineral storage piles, which are usually modelled as source terms by means of the algorithm proposed in the AP-42 US EPA standard. Unfortunately, this algorithm tends to overestimate emissions, and when coupled with a Gaussian dispersion model, it leads to inaccurate results in terms of estimation of both concentration and spatial distribution. This paper proposes a new methodology drawn from the original standard US EPA AP-42 https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch13/scheme with the purpose to account for the actual dynamics of erosion and to enhance the accuracy of the concentration and the pollutant spatial distribution assessment, thereby considering the effects of the wind interactions. The standard EPA methodology and the new one were compared by means of the AERMOD and CALPUFF dispersion models. Results are superimposable in terms of concentration values, leading to a quantification of the same order of magnitude, although with a different and more variable spatial distribution

Combination of field inspection and dispersion modelling to estimate odour emissions from an Italian landfill

“…CALPUFF is a multilayer, multispecies, non-steady-state, puff dispersion model. It is able to account for the effects of time and space variations, meteorological conditions (3D met model), on pollutants transport, transformation, and removal (Romeo et al, 2017).…”

Environmental Risk Assessment for PM2.5 Pollution from Non-Point Sources in the Mining Area Based on Multi-Source Superposition and Diffusion

“…In addition, there has been no unified standard for emission inventory of particulate matter in mining areas. Currently, the AP-42 formula recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is widely used [14,15], or the empirical formula obtained through field wind tunnel experiments is [16][17][18][19], the accuracies of which are varying [20][21][22]. In 2014, the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China compiled the "Technical Guideline for the Preparation of Emission Inventory of Particulate Matter from Dust Sources (Trial) (Technical Guideline for short)", which is more suitable for China's reality [23][24][25].…”