2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DXA has also been previously validated [ 23 , 24 ]. In addition, intra-center coefficients of variation were reported to be within the range of the manufacturer acceptable values (BMD: 1.40%, fat mass: 0.89%, lean mass: 0.76%) [ 25 ]. Relative SMM index of the extremities or trunk was derived from the appendicular SMM or trunk in kilograms, and the index was divided by the square of the height in meters, in line with previous studies [ 21 , 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DXA has also been previously validated [ 23 , 24 ]. In addition, intra-center coefficients of variation were reported to be within the range of the manufacturer acceptable values (BMD: 1.40%, fat mass: 0.89%, lean mass: 0.76%) [ 25 ]. Relative SMM index of the extremities or trunk was derived from the appendicular SMM or trunk in kilograms, and the index was divided by the square of the height in meters, in line with previous studies [ 21 , 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to evaluate global and regional body composition [ 33 , 34 ]. Subjects arrived in the morning, in fasting conditions but well hydrated, as verified by a urinary specific gravity between 1,000 and 1,025, measured with a Brixco refractometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis from the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium did not show consistent associations between DXA measures of lean soft tissue and adverse outcomes in older adults [137,138]. Furthermore, DXA is a costly technique that is also influenced by body thickness, soft tissue hydration, and differences across devices and software versions [19,139,140]. Despite these limitations, DXA is a popular and useful technique as it measures three body compartments and emits low radiation doses.…”
Section: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%