2007
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2007.4282723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Assignment in Distributed Motion Planning with Limited Information

Abstract: Abstract-Distributed motion planning of multiple agents raises fundamental and novel problems in control theory and robotics. In particular, in applications such as coverage by mobile sensor networks or multiple target tracking, a great new challenge is the development of motion planning algorithms that dynamically assign targets or destinations to multiple homogeneous agents, not relying on any a priori assignment of agents to destinations. In this paper, we address this challenge using two novel ideas. First… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other works addressing UAV task-assigment, target locations are known and an assignment strategy is sought that maximizes the global success rate [19], [20] . Moreover, this work holds a place in the recent wave of investigation into the cooperative control of multi-agent systems [21], [22]. Other works addressing cooperative task completion by UAVs include [23], [24], [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other works addressing UAV task-assigment, target locations are known and an assignment strategy is sought that maximizes the global success rate [19], [20] . Moreover, this work holds a place in the recent wave of investigation into the cooperative control of multi-agent systems [21], [22]. Other works addressing cooperative task completion by UAVs include [23], [24], [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several distributed approaches have been developed recently. A distributed heuristic with local communication is explained in (Yun and Rus 2007), while in (Zavlanos and Pappas 2007) the agents are controlled by hybrid models using distributed potential fields. Both approaches fail to return a highly efficient solution since more than one robot can execute the same task for a period of time (until the robots realize they have been executing the same task).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their implementation differs from the classical market-based approach (used in this work) and computes the costs using the information of all of the tasks plus the local information of the robot. There are other recent works on theoretical bounds in Smith and Bullo (2007), Yun and Rus (2007), and Zavlanos and Pappas (2007) but their algorithms are not based on auctions. An important point to note here is that the above-mentioned analyses derive a worst-case bound, a "pessimistic" bound since it is computed assuming that the worst scenario occurs, which may be an unlikely event1 actually, it may not ever happen in a real experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other recent works on theoretical bounds but their algorithms are not based on auctions. In [11] a distributed heuristic with local communication is explained, while in [12] the agents are controlled by hybrid models using distributed potential fields. Both approaches fail to return a highly efficient solution since more than one robot can execute the same task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%