Dynamic Digital Radiography (DDR) in the Diagnosis of a Diaphragm Dysfunction

Abstract

Dynamic digital radiography (DDR) is a recent imaging technique that allows for real-time visualization of thoracic and pulmonary movement in synchronization with the breathing cycle, providing useful clinical information. A 46-year-old male, a former smoker, was evaluated for unexplained dyspnea and reduced exercise tolerance. His medical history included a SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2021. On physical examination, decreased breath sounds were noted at the right-lung base. Spirometry showed results below predicted values. A standard chest radiograph revealed an elevated right hemidiaphragm, a finding not present in a previous CT scan performed during his SARS-CoV-2 infection. To better assess the diaphragmatic function, a posteroanterior DDR study was performed in the standing position with X-ray equipment (AeroDR TX, Konica Minolta Inc., Tokyo, Japan) during forced breath, with the following acquisition parameters: tube voltage, 100 kV; tube current, 50 mA; pulse duration of pulsed X-ray, 1.6 ms; source-to-image distance, 2 m; additional filter, 0.5 mm Al + 0.1 mm Cu. The exposure time was 12 s. The pixel size was 388 × 388 μm, the matrix size was 1024 × 768, and the overall image area was 40 × 30 cm. The dynamic imaging, captured at 15 frames/s, was then assessed on a dedicated workstation (Konica Minolta Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The dynamic acquisition showed a markedly reduced motion of the right diaphragm. The diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction can be challenging due to its range of symptoms, which can vary from mild to severe dyspnea. The standard chest X-ray is usually the first exam to detect an elevated hemidiaphragm, which may suggest motion impairment or paralysis but fails to predict diaphragm function. Ultrasound (US) allows for the direct visualization of the diaphragm and its motion. Still, its effectiveness depends highly on the operator’s experience and could be limited by gas and abdominal fat. Moreover, ultrasound offers limited information regarding the lung parenchyma. On the other hand, high-resolution CT can be useful in identifying causes of diaphragmatic dysfunction, such as atrophy or eventration. However, it does not allow for the quantitative assessment of diaphragmatic movement and the differentiation between paralysis and dysfunction, especially in bilateral dysfunction, which is often overlooked due to the elevation of both hemidiaphragms. Dynamic Digital Radiography (DDR) has emerged as a valuable and innovative imaging technique due to its unique ability to evaluate diaphragm movement in real time, integrating dynamic functional information with static anatomical data. DDR provides both visual and quantitative analysis of the diaphragm’s motion, including excursion and speed, which leads to a definitive diagnosis. Additionally, DDR offers a range of post-processing techniques that provide information on lung movement and pulmonary ventilation. Based on these findings, the patient was referred to a thoracic surgeon and deemed a candidate for surgical plication of the right diaphragm.