2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-012-2009-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic stoichiometric response to food quality fluctuations in the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore examine our second hypothesis by varying the microzooplankton N:C and P:C ratios (Q N Z and Q P Z ), representing the nitrogen and phosphorus requirements of the higher trophic levels ( Table 1). The P:C ratios applied in these simulations are higher than those observed by Meunier et al (2012a), but within the range reported by Grover and Chrzanowski (2006). In these experiments, we keep the microzooplankton C:N:P ratios temporally constant over the whole time course of the experiments.…”
Section: Question 1: Does Phytoplankton Food Quality Shape the Microzsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We therefore examine our second hypothesis by varying the microzooplankton N:C and P:C ratios (Q N Z and Q P Z ), representing the nitrogen and phosphorus requirements of the higher trophic levels ( Table 1). The P:C ratios applied in these simulations are higher than those observed by Meunier et al (2012a), but within the range reported by Grover and Chrzanowski (2006). In these experiments, we keep the microzooplankton C:N:P ratios temporally constant over the whole time course of the experiments.…”
Section: Question 1: Does Phytoplankton Food Quality Shape the Microzsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Variations C:N:P stoichiometry have been reported for microzooplankton (e.g., Meunier et al, 2012a;Grover and Chrzanowski, 2006) and for mesozooplankton (Urabe et al, 2002b;DeMott and Pape, 2005;Ferrao et al, 2007;Iwabuchi and Urabe, 2012b). Differences in elemental stoichiometry within or between the different trophic levels might help elucidate ecological interactions during food-web successions (Plath and Boersma, 2001;Sterner and Elser, 2002;Grover and Chrzanowski, 2006;Sterner et al, 2008;Meunier et al, 2012a,b;Litchman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Question 1: Does Phytoplankton Food Quality Shape the Microzmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we argue that taking an ecosystem view and considering the role of secondary producers can reconcile these observations. It has been shown that while autotrophs limited by nutrient supply accumulate carbon reserves [ Rodolfi et al , ; Griffiths and Harrison , ], microzooplankton under the same restriction deplete them [ Meunier et al , ]. Using mathematical models, we demonstrate that during the transfer of biomass from primary producers to higher trophic levels, the energy costs of assimilation reduce excess carbon and regulate ecosystem elemental composition, which differs from that of the primary producers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%