Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: Towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran

Asadolahi, Zahra; Salmanmahiny, Abdolrassoul; Sakieh, Yousef; Mirkarimi, Seyed Hamed; Baral, Himlal; Azimi, Mojgansadat

doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.09.003

Cited by 87 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, trade-off analysis tools and methods in ecology, economics, geography, and other fields should be used to provide measurement methods of the trade-off relationship between ecosystem services from the perspective of different land-use scenarios [45]. Asadolahi [46] argued that trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services can help planners and decision makers make informed decisions.…”

Section: High-frequency Keyword Clustering Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humans can derive the benefits from the ecosystem to satisfy human needs as well-being. Therefore, good ecosystem management is the intermediary between ecosystems and human well-being. The ecosystem services depend on the supply of nature, and also reflect the value orientation of human beings, as the basis for the realization of human survival and cultural development. Land ecosystem services are the core and hot topic of ecological research. Under the current severe depletion of land use, this research evaluates the sustainable governance on the natural resource shortage, serious environmental pollution and ecosystem degradation. Based on the Web of Science database, this paper analyzes the development characteristics and trends of global land ecosystem services research using the Bibliometrix software package. The results show that (1) the amount of literature on land ecosystem services research between 2000 and 2019 has generally increased significantly, and entered a stage of rapid development from 2015. (2) Developed countries are the main research force in the field of land ecosystem services, and the United States has the absolute leading position. Developing countries are dominated by China, Argentina, and Brazil. (3)The high-frequency keywords for land ecosystem services are land use change, land use, climate change, urbanization, carbon and water quality. This can be regarded as a research hotspot in the field of land ecosystem services to a certain extent. (4) Through cluster analysis on the big data, the research found the direction for the future land ecosystem services, mainly: (I) the restoration of degraded land and its impact on ecosystem services; (II) the environmental impact assessment of land use planning based on the ecosystem services value; (III) the tradeoff analysis of ecosystem services in sustainable land management; (IV) the impact of land cover change on ecosystem services; (V) through the historical analysis of citied papers, the research history and evolution path of land ecosystem services are explored. Based on all these arguments, a comprehensive study on the diverse facets of land ecosystem services and the practical application of land ecosystem services areas is proposed.

show abstract

Section: High-frequency Keyword Clustering Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The habitat quality of each grid is indicated by habitat suitability (value range from 0 to 1, 1 indicates the highest suitability of the habitat, while areas on the landscape that are not habitat get a quality score of 0) and habitat degradation. There are four factors in the function: each threat's relative impact, the relative sensitivity of each habitat type to each threat, the distance between habitats and sources of threats, and the degree to which the land is legally protected [34]. In this study, threats included urban land, rural residential areas, and industrial and mining construction land and cropland.…”

Section: Habitat Quality (Hq)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, acquiring knowledge of how multiple ESs interactions occur locally is more likely to achieve a win-win situation [50]. Contrasted with previous studies that focused on trade-offs and synergies between paired ESs [34,41], we explored the multiple ESs interactions based on the grid cells. Regarding the inherent complexity of integrated social and ecological systems, most of the ecosystem services interact with one another.…”

Section: Multiple Ess Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatially Explicit Analysis of Trade-Offs and Synergies among Multiple Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Valley Basins

Sun

Liu

et al. 2020

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services (ESs) is the basis of sustainable ecosystem management. The ecological environment of valley basins is very fragile, while bearing the enormous pressure of economic development and population growth, which has damaged the balance of the ecosystem structure and ecosystem services. In this study, we selected two typical valley basins—Guanzhong Basin and Hanzhong Basin—as study areas. The spatial heterogeneity of trade-offs and synergies among multiple ESs (net primary production (NPP), habitat quality (HQ), soil conservation (SC), water conservation (WC), and food supply (FS)) were quantified using the correlation analysis and spatial overlay based on the gird scale to quantitatively analyze and compare the interaction among ESs in two basins. Our results found that: (1) Trade-offs between FS and other four services NPP, HQ, SC, and WC were discovered in two basins, and there were synergistic relationships between NPP, HQ, SC, and WC. (2) From 2000 to 2018, the conflicted relationships between paired ESs gradually increased, and the synergistic relationship became weaker. Furthermore, the rate of change in Guanzhong Basin was stronger than that in Hanzhong Basin. (3) The spatial synergies and trade-offs between NPP and HQ, WC and NPP, FS and HQ, SC and FS were widespread in two basins. The strong trade-offs between pair ESs were widly distributed in the central and southwest of Guanzhong Basin and the southeast of Hanzhong Basin. (4) Multiple ecosystem service interactions were concentrated in the north of Qinling Mountain, the central of Guanzhong Basins, and the east of Hanzhong Basin. Our research highlights the importance of taking spatial perspective and accounting for multiple ecosystem service interactions, and provide a reliable basis for achieving ecological sustainable development of the valley basin.

show abstract

“…Recently researchers have changed their focus from the global scale [49] to a finer scale, since details can be used to provide some advice for specific areas [33,[50][51][52][53][54]. The planning and management of land use is an attempt to achieve land use configuration by influencing the dynamics of land use changes so that a balance is maintained between the stakeholders and environmental needs [31,55].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change of the Upper and Middle Streams of the Luan River, Northern China

Guan

Jiang

et al. 2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climatic, socio-economic, geophysical, and human activity factors, among others, influence land use patterns. However, these driving factors also have different relationships with each other. Combining machine learning methods and statistical models is a good way to simulate the dominant land use types. The Luan River basin is located in a farming-pastoral transitional zone and is an important ecological barrier between Beijing and Tianjin. In this study, we predicted future land use and land cover changes from 2010 to 2020 in the Luan River’s upper and middle reaches under three scenarios—the natural scenario, the ecological scenario, and the sustainable scenario. The results indicate that cultivated land will decrease while the forested areas will increase quantitatively in the future. Built-up areas would increase quickly in the natural scenario, and augmented expansion of forest would be the main features of land use changes in both the ecological scenario and the sustainable scenario. Regarding the spatial pattern, different land use patterns will be aggregated and patches will become larger. Our findings for the scenario analysis of land use changes can provide a reference case for sustainable land use planning and management in the upper and middle Luan River basin.

show abstract

Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: Towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran

Cited by 87 publications

References 48 publications

A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research

A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research

Spatially Explicit Analysis of Trade-Offs and Synergies among Multiple Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Valley Basins

Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change of the Upper and Middle Streams of the Luan River, Northern China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About