1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems

Abstract: We propose a novel dynamical method for beating decoherence and dissipation in open quantum systems. We demonstrate the possibility of filtering out the effects of unwanted (not necessarily known) system-environment interactions and show that the noise-suppression procedure can be combined with the capability of retaining control over the effective dynamical evolution of the open quantum system. Implications for quantum information processing are discussed.Comment: 4 pages, no figures; Plain ReVTeX. Final vers… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
1,774
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,675 publications
(1,791 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
10
1,774
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In coherent feedback, the quantum system is connected to an auxiliary quantum controller (ancilla) that acquires information about the system's output state (by an entangling operation) and performs an appropriate feedback action (by a conditional gate). In contrast to open-loop dynamical decoupling (DD) techniques [10], feedback control can protect the qubit even against Markovian noise and for an arbitrary period of time (limited only by the ancilla coherence time), while allowing gate operations. It is thus more closely related to Quantum Error Correction schemes [11][12][13][14], which however require larger and increasing qubit overheads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coherent feedback, the quantum system is connected to an auxiliary quantum controller (ancilla) that acquires information about the system's output state (by an entangling operation) and performs an appropriate feedback action (by a conditional gate). In contrast to open-loop dynamical decoupling (DD) techniques [10], feedback control can protect the qubit even against Markovian noise and for an arbitrary period of time (limited only by the ancilla coherence time), while allowing gate operations. It is thus more closely related to Quantum Error Correction schemes [11][12][13][14], which however require larger and increasing qubit overheads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Even more complex control sequences given by various dynamical decoupling schemes [39][40][41][42] are compatible with the balancing protocol, provided we toggle the phase of the continuous irradiation with each π-pulse to maintain the end-spins on resonance with the bulk mode. Dynamical decoupling techniques can thus be used to increase the coherence time 43 to be much longer than the transport time, thus reducing the effects of decoherence on the transport fidelity.…”
Section: A Robust Transport Under Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If so, one can search for robust control waveforms by maximizing the average fidelityF S = Λ P(Λ)F(Λ)dΛ, where P(Λ) is the probability that the parameters take on the values Λ, and F(Λ) is the corresponding fidelity. If the parameters vary with time, one can average over an ensemble of histories, Λ = {λ i (t)}, and search for control waveforms with built-in dynamical decoupling [21]. Robust control is essential in real-world scenarios, but until now little has been known about its feasibility in large Hilbert spaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%