2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.78.052329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical properties across a quantum phase transition in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model

Abstract: It is of high interest, in the context of Adiabatic Quantum Computation, to better understand the complex dynamics of a quantum system subject to a time-dependent Hamiltonian, when driven across a quantum phase transition. We present here such a study in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model with one variable parameter. We first display numerical results on the dynamical evolution across the LMG quantum phase transition, which clearly shows a pronounced effect of the spectral avoided level crossings. We then de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy gap measurements show evidence of a nonzero gap at the QCP arising from finite-size effects, and using a carefully tailored slow ramp of the Hamiltonian parameters, we have adiabatically crossed the QCP with no apparent excitation of the system. We hope that this work stimulates similar investigations in related many-body systems, and in particular, we anticipate that the results of this study could directly inform investigations in double-well Bose-Josephson junction systems, (pseudo)spin-1/2 interacting systems (48,49), and the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model (43,50), which share similar Hamiltonians.…”
Section: Adiabatic Qptmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The energy gap measurements show evidence of a nonzero gap at the QCP arising from finite-size effects, and using a carefully tailored slow ramp of the Hamiltonian parameters, we have adiabatically crossed the QCP with no apparent excitation of the system. We hope that this work stimulates similar investigations in related many-body systems, and in particular, we anticipate that the results of this study could directly inform investigations in double-well Bose-Josephson junction systems, (pseudo)spin-1/2 interacting systems (48,49), and the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model (43,50), which share similar Hamiltonians.…”
Section: Adiabatic Qptmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It also found applications in several different fields, leading to a variety of results in terms of entanglement properties of its ground state [23][24][25] and spin squeezing [26]. For finite-size chains LMG have been characterized in terms of fidelity susceptibility [27][28][29] and adiabatic dynamics [30][31][32]. Although the LMG model cannot be solved analytically for a generic chain size, some of its extensions are amenable to an exact solution [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters can be controlled by adjusting the relevant parameters such as the detunings, Rabi frequencies, and coupling coefficients. (12)) Isotropic LMG model (Equation (14)) One-axis twisting LMG model (Equation (16)) √ N g k (N ≃ 10 12 ) 12 12 12…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the two-axis counter-twisting Hamiltonian is superior to the one-axis twisting one, the spin-spin interaction with the form of two-axis countertwisting has not been realized in any experiments due to the demanding requirements [19][20][21][22]61]. We will discuss how to prepare spin squeezed states by simulating the two-axis counter-twisting interaction with equation (12) in our scheme. In this system, the coherent coupling strength between a single NV center and the cavity is much less than the cavity dissipation rates (|g i | ≪ κ a,b ), but this collective coupling can be enhanced by increasing the number of the NV centers.…”
Section: The Spin Squeezed Statementioning
confidence: 99%