2020
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical systems theory in cognitive science and neuroscience

Abstract: Dynamical systems theory (DST) is a branch of mathematics that assesses abstract or physical systems that change over time. It has a quantitative part (mathematical equations) and a related qualitative part (plotting equations in a state space). Nonlinear dynamical systems theory applies the same tools in research involving phenomena such as chaos and hysteresis. These approaches have provided different ways of investigating and understanding cognitive systems in cognitive science and neuroscience. The ‘dynami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamical systems theory is becoming increasingly popular in contemporary neuroscience (for a small sample see Breakspear 2017;Deco et al 2017;Honey and Sporns 2008;Izhikevich 2007;Rabinovich et al 2006;Sussillo 2014). In spite of the increased prominence in neuroscience research, discussion of dynamical systems theory in neuroscience among philosophers has been minimal (exceptions to this include Chemero and Silberstein 2008;Chirimuuta 2018;Favela 2019Favela , 2020Ross 2015). This is slightly odd given significant discussion of dynamical systems in cognitive science by philosophers (see Sect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dynamical systems theory is becoming increasingly popular in contemporary neuroscience (for a small sample see Breakspear 2017;Deco et al 2017;Honey and Sporns 2008;Izhikevich 2007;Rabinovich et al 2006;Sussillo 2014). In spite of the increased prominence in neuroscience research, discussion of dynamical systems theory in neuroscience among philosophers has been minimal (exceptions to this include Chemero and Silberstein 2008;Chirimuuta 2018;Favela 2019Favela , 2020Ross 2015). This is slightly odd given significant discussion of dynamical systems in cognitive science by philosophers (see Sect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many excellent general introductions to dynamical systems theory (e.g., Alligood et al 2000;Fuchs 2013;Guckenheimer and Holmes 1983;Strogatz 2015), as well as its applications in the mind sciences (e.g., Beer 2000;Chemero 2009;Clark 1997;Guastello et al 2011;Port 2006;Riley and Holden 2012;Thelen and Smith 1994). The current introduction is aimed at providing a general overview and giving a sense of the aspects of dynamical systems theory that will be most significant in later sections (Favela 2020). To begin, dynamical systems theory is a branch of mathematics that can evaluate both abstract and physical systems as they change over time.…”
Section: A Very Concise Introduction To Dynamical Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But this cannot be the case. DST categorically rejects the notion of representation or cognition as information processing (Favela, 2020). From the classics, we have the insight: 'rather than computation, cognitive processes may be dynamical systems; rather than computation, cognitive processes may be state-space evolution within these very different kinds of systems' (Van Gelder, 1995, p. 346).…”
Section: Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling of eye and bodily movements Onset of motor control Kelso et al, 1998;Shenoy et al, 2013 Chemero andSilberstein, 2008;Vernazzani, 2019*;Favela, 2020b Coupling ratio Bimanual coordination (relative phase) Haken et al, 1985Chemero, 2000, 2001Kaplan and Craver, 2011*;Stepp et al, 2011;Zednik, 2011*;Lamb and Chemero, 2014;Golonka and Wilson, 2019*;Meyer, 2020 Strength of memory trace, salience of target, waiting time, stance Infant reaching (A-not-B error) Thelen et al, 2001Zednik, 2011Gervais, 2015;Verdejo, 2015;Venturelli, 2016;van Eck, 2018*;Meyer, 2020;Povich, in press* Potassium and sodium ion flows Neural excitability Hodgkin and Huxley, 1952;FitzHugh, 1961;Nagumo et al, 1962 Craver andKaplan, 2011*;Kaplan and Bechtel, 2011*;Kaplan and Craver, 2011*;Ross, 2015;Hochstein, 2017*;Favela, 2020a,b The explanans (first column) is the factor that explains. The explanandum (second column) is the phenomenon to be explained.…”
Section: Dynamical Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%