1998
DOI: 10.35536/lje.1998.v3.i1.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in Pakistan

Abstract: This paper addresses two topics which essentially compliment each other. The first is the empirical investigation of the relationship between aggregate agricultural productivity and poverty in Pakistan through the course of time. The second is the estimation of the central inputs or determinants of agricultural production, again on an aggregate level and through time. The main empirical findings of this research suggest that increases in agricultural productivity have alleviated poverty in Pakistan but not to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper analyzed total factor productivity by decomposing it into technical efficiency change and technological change by applying the Malmquist productivity index, using data envelop analysis from 1980 to 2018. Different researchers worked on and conducted studies to analyze the agricultural productivity of Pakistan (Parikh and Shah, 1994;Hussain and Ishfaq, 1997;Khan et al, 2003;Iqbal et al, 2002;Ahmad, 2001;Mushtaq and Dawson, 2003;Ali and Iqbal, 2004;Ali and Iqbal, 2005;Kiani et al, 2008;Fatima and Yasmin, 2016). However, these studies used old data sets or focused on partial studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper analyzed total factor productivity by decomposing it into technical efficiency change and technological change by applying the Malmquist productivity index, using data envelop analysis from 1980 to 2018. Different researchers worked on and conducted studies to analyze the agricultural productivity of Pakistan (Parikh and Shah, 1994;Hussain and Ishfaq, 1997;Khan et al, 2003;Iqbal et al, 2002;Ahmad, 2001;Mushtaq and Dawson, 2003;Ali and Iqbal, 2004;Ali and Iqbal, 2005;Kiani et al, 2008;Fatima and Yasmin, 2016). However, these studies used old data sets or focused on partial studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%