2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of large woody debris in small streams disturbed by the 2001 Dogrib fire in the Alberta foothills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) Burned status of the SW piece was assessed following Jones and Daniels (2008), using three classes (unburned: no char; moderately: charred bark but outermost ring present in at least one part of the circumference; heavily: charred bark and sapwood resulting in significant ring loss); (ii) Source tree (maritime pine, eucalyptus, cork oak, or "riparian species") was identified by assessing morphological characteristics of the wood piece; (iii) Length in meters was determined to the nearest 0.2 m for the segments of the pieces that were >1 cm in diameter. We measured length using a meter tape for pieces >6 m long, and estimated length for pieces <6 m (verified for the first 20 pieces per reach); (iv) Diameter was determined to the nearest 0.5 cm by a single measurement taken from a point considered the mean diameter by visual assessment.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Burned status of the SW piece was assessed following Jones and Daniels (2008), using three classes (unburned: no char; moderately: charred bark but outermost ring present in at least one part of the circumference; heavily: charred bark and sapwood resulting in significant ring loss); (ii) Source tree (maritime pine, eucalyptus, cork oak, or "riparian species") was identified by assessing morphological characteristics of the wood piece; (iii) Length in meters was determined to the nearest 0.2 m for the segments of the pieces that were >1 cm in diameter. We measured length using a meter tape for pieces >6 m long, and estimated length for pieces <6 m (verified for the first 20 pieces per reach); (iv) Diameter was determined to the nearest 0.5 cm by a single measurement taken from a point considered the mean diameter by visual assessment.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, removal of riparian forest may adversely affect thermal regime (see reviews in Morash 2001, Steedman et al 2004), inputs of fine organic matter (Webster and Waide 1982, Webster et al 1990, Hartman et al 1996, and recruitment of coarse woody material (Dolloff and Webster 2000, Meleason et al 2003, Jones andDaniels 2008). Stream temperature typically is influenced by forest within 10 to 30 m of shorelines depending on tree height and canopy density (Barton et al 1985, Castelle et al 1994, Sridhar et al 2004, Wilkerson et al 2006).…”
Section: Thoughtfully Plannedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal transfer of LW along a stream is influenced by the characteristics of the wood pieces (storage and diameter, length, and wood density), the morphology of the channel (dimensions of bankfull channel, slope, bed forms and roughness) and flow conditions [4] and [5]. The amount and longitudinal distribution of wood have been studied in many rivers of the world, and findings demonstrate that wood distribution depends on land use at the basin scale, size of the basin, fire disturbance, flow regime, riparian vegetation, and morphology of the river [4]- [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount and longitudinal distribution of wood have been studied in many rivers of the world, and findings demonstrate that wood distribution depends on land use at the basin scale, size of the basin, fire disturbance, flow regime, riparian vegetation, and morphology of the river [4]- [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%