2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0956792516000462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of screw dislocations: A generalised minimising-movements scheme approach

Abstract: The gradient flow structure of the model introduced in [CG99] for the dynamics of screw dislocations is investigated by means of a generalised minimising-movements scheme approach. The assumption of a finite number of available glide directions, together with the "maximal dissipation criterion" that governs the equations of motion, results into solving a differential inclusion rather than an ODE. This paper addresses how the model in [CG99] is connected to a time-discrete evolution scheme which explicitly conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is commonly observed in numerical simulations that dislocations are attracted to free boundaries and that dislocations of opposite signs attract. In fact, as dislocations approach the boundary, or as dislocations with Burgers moduli of opposite sign approach one another, the renormalised energy diverges to −∞, and hence solutions of the evolution problem blow up and cease to exist, at least in the senses considered in [BFLM15,BvMM16]. In Lemma 2.4, we prove a gradient bound for the function h Ω for points in the vicinity of the boundary: this allows us to treat case (i).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is commonly observed in numerical simulations that dislocations are attracted to free boundaries and that dislocations of opposite signs attract. In fact, as dislocations approach the boundary, or as dislocations with Burgers moduli of opposite sign approach one another, the renormalised energy diverges to −∞, and hence solutions of the evolution problem blow up and cease to exist, at least in the senses considered in [BFLM15,BvMM16]. In Lemma 2.4, we prove a gradient bound for the function h Ω for points in the vicinity of the boundary: this allows us to treat case (i).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Various suggestions for possible mobility functions can be found in [CG99]; we refer the reader to Section 5 for a discussion on other possible choices that are relevant in our context. For a specific choice of the mobility, (1.9) takes the form of a differential inclusion, and was studied both in [BFLM15] to obtain existence and uniqueness results, and in [BvMM16] from the point of view of gradient flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If one restricts to the motion of parallel dislocations, the problem becomes twodimensional, since the dislocations are modelled as points. In this case, the mathematical analysis of dynamics model already exist in the wake of Ginsburg-Landau vortices dynamics, and can be found for instance in [1,2,8,9]. The dynamics of this kind of dislocations have been studied by several authors, see for instance the important contributions [18] and [25] for a rate-independent evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the dislocations alone are tracked in this approach has the advantage of drastically reducing the computational complexity in comparison with phase field approaches, and as such, DDD has been used as a simulation technique for studying plasticity since the early 1990s [5,6,8,17,33,44,77]. While a significant mathematical literature has developed which considers one-and two-dimensional DDD models for the motion of straight dislocations [1,2,12,13,15,23,24,46,47,78], few mathematical results concerning DDD in a three-dimensional setting exist to date, and in part, this appears to be due to the lack of a clear mathematical statement of what the evolution problem for DDD should be in this setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%