2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks after afforestation in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on prior land use, the collected dataset was divided into cropland (CL), grassland (GL), and barren land (BL). Prior land use types such as savanna, fallow land, and bare mines were classified into the GL and BL categories, respectively, because of the small amounts (Liu et al, ). Tree species classifications included conifer, broadleaf, shrub, and mixed types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on prior land use, the collected dataset was divided into cropland (CL), grassland (GL), and barren land (BL). Prior land use types such as savanna, fallow land, and bare mines were classified into the GL and BL categories, respectively, because of the small amounts (Liu et al, ). Tree species classifications included conifer, broadleaf, shrub, and mixed types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, long-term soil nutrient availability, which is essential for sustainable timer and/or carbon emission reduction, is not fully understood (Berthrong, Pineiro, Jobbagy, & Jackson, 2012), and the altered pools and cycles resulting from afforestation can in turn affect biomass production and ecosystem function (Yao, Shao, Jia, & Li, 2017). During the last two decades, soil carbon (C) and soil nitrogen (N) have been extensively studied at different scales and major influencing factors such as climate, prior land use, plantation age, tree species, and soil texture have been studied in depth (Barcena et al, 2014;Berthrong et al, 2012;Liu, Yang, Wang, Huang, & Li, 2018). However, levels of soil phosphorus (P), one of the most common limiting nutrients, can also regulate changes in soil C stocks following afforestation (Vitousek, Porder, Houlton, & Chadwick, 2010), mainly by controlling net primary productivity and C allocation in forest ecosystems, the decomposition rate of soil C, and the soil C sequestration process (Bronson et al, 2004;Shi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous types of land use might affect the rate of plant and soil carbon sequestration due to the altered vegetation and soil conditions. For example, grasslands tend to accumulate soil C at faster rates than agricultural sites (Silver et al 2000;Kukal and Bawa 2014;Liu et al 2018). Generally, cultivated or pasture lands are characterized by low soil nutrient levels because of a depletion of organic matter inputs by human activities (Kukal and Bawa 2014;Liu et al 2018).…”
Section: Previous Land Use Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, grasslands tend to accumulate soil C at faster rates than agricultural sites (Silver et al 2000;Kukal and Bawa 2014;Liu et al 2018). Generally, cultivated or pasture lands are characterized by low soil nutrient levels because of a depletion of organic matter inputs by human activities (Kukal and Bawa 2014;Liu et al 2018). In contrast, natural grasslands continuously maintain vegetation cover on the soil, and can have high rates of accumulation and turnover that add organic matter from below ground to the soil (Li et al 2012).…”
Section: Previous Land Use Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land use and land-cover changes have attracted increasing scientific interest in the past decades in relation to their contribution to potential impacts on soil carbon sequestration and soil nitrogen [39]. Liu et al estimated the changes in SOC (a) and total nitrogen (TN) stocks (b) after afforestation of arid and semiarid regions using meta-analysis based on the dataset compiled from published studies (Figure 2) [40].…”
Section: Dynamic Characteristics Of Forest Soil Carbon 41 Evolution mentioning
confidence: 99%