2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earliest evidence of caries lesion in hominids reveal sugar-rich diet for a Middle Miocene dryopithecine from Europe

Abstract: The formation of dental caries is mainly caused by dietary habits and therefore, may contain information for dietary reconstructions of fossil hominids. This study investigates the caries lesion in the 12.5 Ma old type specimen of Dryopithecus carinthiacus Mottl 1957 (Primates, Hominidae) from St. Stefan (Austria). Potential food sources are identified on associated palynological data, which allow conclusions about food quality, sugar availability and the hominid metabolism during the Middle Miocene. Using mic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dietary and behavioral differences are known between male and female chimpanzees (Gilby et al, 2017; Nakamura et al, 2015; Wrangham and Smuts, 1980). Pregnancy and differences in oral pH, saliva, physiology, life history, and microbiome between the sexes may also be predisposing factors (e.g., Fuss et al, 2018; Lukacs and Largaespada, 2006; Stoner, 1995). The results of the present study support other research suggesting sex differences in caries rates among the great apes, although the present sample of gorillas did not show significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dietary and behavioral differences are known between male and female chimpanzees (Gilby et al, 2017; Nakamura et al, 2015; Wrangham and Smuts, 1980). Pregnancy and differences in oral pH, saliva, physiology, life history, and microbiome between the sexes may also be predisposing factors (e.g., Fuss et al, 2018; Lukacs and Largaespada, 2006; Stoner, 1995). The results of the present study support other research suggesting sex differences in caries rates among the great apes, although the present sample of gorillas did not show significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature has shown caries is not as rare as previously thought in fossil hominin and extant great apes (e.g., Arnaud et al, 2016; Lacy, 2014; Lacy et al, 2012; Lanfranco & Eggers, 2012; Liu et al, 2015; Margvelashvili et al, 2016; Miles & Grigson, 2003; Stoner, 1995; Towle et al, 2019; Trinkaus et al, 2000). There is also growing evidence that caries was common in other extinct primates (e.g., Fuss et al, 2018; Han and Zhao, 2002; Selig and Silcox, 2020). This study adds further evidence that caries has likely been relatively common in many primate lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honey is commonly consumed in many recent hunter-gatherer groups, and may therefore also be a potential factor involved in caries formation (Pontzer et al, 2018). More broadly, caries has also been found to be relatively prevalent in other wild great apes, and a lesion has been described in a Middle Miocene hominid (Stoner, 1995;Miles & Grigson, 2003;Fuss et al, 2018). The relatively high rate of caries may therefore be broader and be a hominid characteristic, although clearly there is much variation between species which allows dietary and behavioral inferences for fossil samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in caries experience (and more broadly in oral pathology) is well documented by time, space, and subsistence regime. Carious lesions have been found on fossil hominins as far back as 1.77 Ma, including several individuals from Dmanisi (Margvelashvili et al 2016) or even further back to 12.5 Ma on the type specimen of Dryopithecus carinthiacus (Fuss, Uhlig, and Böhme 2018). Instead of using the presence, distribution, and severity of oral pathology lesions in individuals or across skeletal samples such as these paleontological cases illustrate, bioarchaeologists are generally obsessed with broad comparisons of pathology frequencies to make assumptions about, and link, pathology to diet and subsistence patterns in past human groups.…”
Section: Daniel H Templementioning
confidence: 99%