2006
DOI: 10.1086/499067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early and Rapid Merging as a Formation Mechanism of Massive Galaxies: Empirical Constraints

Abstract: We present the results of a series of empirical computations regarding the role of major mergers in forming the stellar masses of modern galaxies based on measured galaxy merger and star formation histories from z $ 0:5 to 3. We reconstruct the merger history of normal field galaxies from z $ 3 to z $ 0 as a function of initial mass using published pair fractions and merger fractions from structural analyses. We calibrate the observed merger timescale and mass ratios for galaxy mergers using self-consistent N-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
377
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(230 reference statements)
30
377
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we note that our MASSIV data seem to indicate a flattening of the merger rate's evolution beyond z ∼ 1. Previous studies from morphological criteria (e.g., Conselice 2003;Conselice et al 2008) and from photometric pairs (Ryan et al 2008) suggest that the power-law parametrization is not longer valid at z 1.5, where a lower merger fraction than expected from the low-z evolution is measured, possibly indicating a maximum in the major merger rate at z ∼ 2 (e.g., Conselice 2006;Ryan et al 2008;López-Sanjuan et al 2009b). Our new measurements agree with this picture and measurements from spectroscopic close pairs beyond z ∼ 1.5 are needed to test the early evolution of the merger fraction.…”
Section: The Redshift Evolution Of the Gas-rich Major Merger Ratementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, we note that our MASSIV data seem to indicate a flattening of the merger rate's evolution beyond z ∼ 1. Previous studies from morphological criteria (e.g., Conselice 2003;Conselice et al 2008) and from photometric pairs (Ryan et al 2008) suggest that the power-law parametrization is not longer valid at z 1.5, where a lower merger fraction than expected from the low-z evolution is measured, possibly indicating a maximum in the major merger rate at z ∼ 2 (e.g., Conselice 2006;Ryan et al 2008;López-Sanjuan et al 2009b). Our new measurements agree with this picture and measurements from spectroscopic close pairs beyond z ∼ 1.5 are needed to test the early evolution of the merger fraction.…”
Section: The Redshift Evolution Of the Gas-rich Major Merger Ratementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although it is possible that in some high mass ratio mergers the low mass companion will become highly asymmetric while the high mass companion will not, we statistically correct the merger fraction to select only major mergers, so the assumption that fam = 1 is still reasonable. Following the definition in Conselice (2006), the fraction of galaxies in major mergers is given by…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this is inverse of the notation used in Conselice (2006), but the same as Hopkins et al (2010b).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results notwithstanding, according to current formation scenarios, merging has played an important role in the mass assembly of most of the local massive elliptical galaxies. Observations and theory suggest that, first, violent mergers at high z have transformed most of the available gas into stars, and, later on, these systems might have evolved through gas-free (the so-called dry) mergers (Conselice 2006; see otherwise Scarlata et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%