1989
DOI: 10.1084/jem.169.4.1391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early human IgH gene assembly in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed fetal B cell lines. Preferential utilization of the most JH-proximal D segment (DQ52) and two unusual VH-related rearrangements.

Abstract: We have analyzed the phenotypic characteristics and IgH gene rearrangements in a panel of EBV-transformed B lineage cell lines from human fetal liver and bone marrow. Some lines contained only populations of immature, Ig- Be cells, while others contained mixed populations of mature and immature B cells. The majority of identifiable IgH rearrangements involved joining of the most JH-proximal D segment, DQ52, to various JH segments, implying that DQ52 is a preferred target for initial DJH rearrangements. Three o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by the time the in utero gestational period was over, the D segment use shifted to the 5ЈV H proximal end of the locus, particularly increasing the frequencies of D2-2, D3-3, D3-10, and D6 -13 in full-term neonates and adults. Moreover, the finding that in the fetus the two most J H proximal D segments, D1-26 and D7-27, preferentially rearranged with J H 2 and J H 3 further supports the hypothesis that proximity of the D segment and J H pairing is favored in the V H DJ H rearrangement process in B lineage cells of the fetus (32,33). Even though reports suggested that the reason for fetal D7-27 pairing with 5ЈJ H segments was based on the D segment size (12,19), we consider this unlikely because other small D segments, such as the ones in the D4 family, were not frequently used, whereas the relatively long D1-26, which is the second most J H proximal D segment, also paired preferentially with 5ЈJ H segments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, by the time the in utero gestational period was over, the D segment use shifted to the 5ЈV H proximal end of the locus, particularly increasing the frequencies of D2-2, D3-3, D3-10, and D6 -13 in full-term neonates and adults. Moreover, the finding that in the fetus the two most J H proximal D segments, D1-26 and D7-27, preferentially rearranged with J H 2 and J H 3 further supports the hypothesis that proximity of the D segment and J H pairing is favored in the V H DJ H rearrangement process in B lineage cells of the fetus (32,33). Even though reports suggested that the reason for fetal D7-27 pairing with 5ЈJ H segments was based on the D segment size (12,19), we consider this unlikely because other small D segments, such as the ones in the D4 family, were not frequently used, whereas the relatively long D1-26, which is the second most J H proximal D segment, also paired preferentially with 5ЈJ H segments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The existence of separate DH and JH chromatin domains may help repress recombination of V H to unrearranged DH gene segments. This organization may also explain the preferential targeting of the DFL16.1 and DQ52 segments in initial DJH rearrangements (32)(33)(34), because these segments would be located at the 5Ј extremity of each domain and hence potentially close to cis-acting chromatin regulatory elements. An increased use of DFL16.1 and a decreased frequency of JH3 and JH4 rearrangements were indeed observed in mice deleted for the DQ52 segment (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the human system, DHQ52-J 1 joining was frequently observed in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed fetal B cell lines (23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%