2023
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early life supplementation with a natural blend containing turmeric, thymol, and yeast cell wall components to optimize rumen anatomical and microbiological development and productivity in dairy goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of anaerobic fungi to form resistant spores that allow them to retain viability in dung, soil and feed, may explain the similar anaerobic fugal concentration and diversity observed across treatments ( 64 ). Moreover this anaerobic fungal concentration was higher (2 logs) than we previously reported in ruminants fed concentrate diets suggesting an active role in fiber degradation ( 65 ). Anaerobic fungi, due to their long life cycle and they ability to digest recalcitrant lignocellulosic substrates, are efficient feed degraders ( 66 ) and able to penetrate the plant cuticle providing additional sites for bacteria to attach to protected plant tissues ( 60 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The ability of anaerobic fungi to form resistant spores that allow them to retain viability in dung, soil and feed, may explain the similar anaerobic fugal concentration and diversity observed across treatments ( 64 ). Moreover this anaerobic fungal concentration was higher (2 logs) than we previously reported in ruminants fed concentrate diets suggesting an active role in fiber degradation ( 65 ). Anaerobic fungi, due to their long life cycle and they ability to digest recalcitrant lignocellulosic substrates, are efficient feed degraders ( 66 ) and able to penetrate the plant cuticle providing additional sites for bacteria to attach to protected plant tissues ( 60 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%