2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early stages of the chemical vapor deposition of pyrolytic carbon investigated by atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, lower deposition pressure is more likely to reduce the Ra of the droplets, which means the 1·1 kPa deposition owns smaller Ra comparing to the 1·8 kPa deposition in our experiment. Woo, 17 Andreas 29 both suggest that pyrocarbon of high texture grows in an island growth mechanism. The droplets firstly deposit and nucleate at active sites, form isolated islands, then grow at a constant radial growth velocity concentrically around its nucleus point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, lower deposition pressure is more likely to reduce the Ra of the droplets, which means the 1·1 kPa deposition owns smaller Ra comparing to the 1·8 kPa deposition in our experiment. Woo, 17 Andreas 29 both suggest that pyrocarbon of high texture grows in an island growth mechanism. The droplets firstly deposit and nucleate at active sites, form isolated islands, then grow at a constant radial growth velocity concentrically around its nucleus point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allouche et al [23][24][25] reported the deposition of carbon on CNTs, and used the droplet model to interpret the deposited carbon with various morphology like cones and beads. Pfrang et al investigated the carbon nucleation of PyC on planar silicon substrate using atomic force microscopy, but did not describe the details of the nucleation [26]. Smooth deposition of pyrolytic carbon on CNTs was also demonstrated in the preparation of VGCFs [27], implying a different deposition mechanism other than droplet model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%