2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early surgery vs conservative management among asymptomatic aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients assigned to early surgery had a significantly lower incidence of the primary composite end point than did those in the conservative arm, according to an intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23–0.90]; p = 0.02). In secondary endpoints, there was no statistically significant difference, even when trends were in line with the primary outcome, such as all-cause death, initial heart failure hospitalizations, significant bleeding or thromboembolic events [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients assigned to early surgery had a significantly lower incidence of the primary composite end point than did those in the conservative arm, according to an intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23–0.90]; p = 0.02). In secondary endpoints, there was no statistically significant difference, even when trends were in line with the primary outcome, such as all-cause death, initial heart failure hospitalizations, significant bleeding or thromboembolic events [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta-analysis was conducted and reported following the Cochrane and PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) 2020 guidelines and performed according to established methods, as described previously. [18][19][20][21] The prespecified study protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42022357336).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was carried out in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and meta-analysis 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines and performed according to established methods [17] , [18] . A pre-specified study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022363138).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%