Early Word Segmentation Behind the Mask

Abstract

Infants have been shown to rely both on auditory and visual cues when processing speech. We investigated the impact of COVID-related changes, in particular of face masks, in early word segmentation abilities. Following up on our previous study demonstrating that, by 4 months, infants already segmented targets presented auditorily at utterance-edge position, and, using the same visual familiarization paradigm, 7–9-month-old infants performed an auditory and an audiovisual word segmentation experiment in two conditions: without and with an FFP2 face mask. Analysis of acoustic and visual cues showed changes in face-masked speech affecting the amount, weight, and location of cues. Utterance-edge position displayed more salient cues than utterance-medial position, but the cues were attenuated in face-masked speech. Results revealed no evidence for segmentation, not even at edge position, regardless of mask condition and auditory or visual speech presentation. However, in the audiovisual experiment, infants attended more to the screen during the test trials when familiarized with without mask speech. Also, the infants attended more to the mouth and less to the eyes in without mask than with mask. In addition, evidence for an advantage of the utterance-edge position in emerging segmentation abilities was found. Thus, audiovisual information provided some support to developing word segmentation. We compared 7–9-monthers segmentation ability observed in the Butler and Frota pre-COVID study with the current auditory without mask data. Mean looking time for edge was significantly higher than unfamiliar in the pre-COVID study only. Measures of cognitive and language development obtained with the CSBS scales showed that the infants of the current study scored significantly lower than the same-age infants from the CSBS (pre-COVID) normative data. Our results suggest an overall effect of the pandemic on early segmentation abilities and language development, calling for longitudinal studies to determine how development proceeds.

Language acquisition in a post-pandemic context: the impact of measures against COVID-19 on early language development

“…Furthermore, Deoni’s study also showed that SES, birth weight and gestation duration were protective factors, since children with lower SES, lower weight and/or shorter gestation were more affected. In a similar line, Frota et al (2022) found that post-pandemic children exhibited lower performance at word segmentation tasks than pre-pandemic children.…”

Duration Perception and Reading in Typically Developing Adults and Adults with Developmental Dyslexia: Implications for Assessment and Intervention

“…Syllables, in turn, may serve as the framework for phoneme representations [ 31 ]. Unlike Portuguese, where syllable-timing is prevalent, Greek leans towards stress-timing [ 32 ]. Therefore, the question arises: why would entrainment to stress rates enhance speech encoding in Greek participants?…”

Prevalence of Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder in Korea Using National Statistics Including the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2011 to 2021

“…Nevertheless, the prevalence of ASD in 2020 to 2021 markedly increased. As an explanation for the increased prevalence of ASD during the COVID-19 pandemic, we suggest that measures like mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic might have interfered with children's development, especially language development, in which children learn by looking at their caregivers' mouths and facial expressions [29,30]. Due to self-isolation and social distancing to prevent the spread of infection, professional education hours have decreased in daycare centers, and children with ASD symptoms have experienced an aggravation of psychiatric and behavioral problems [31,32].…”