2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.010401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eavesdropping on the Decohering Environment: Quantum Darwinism, Amplification, and the Origin of Objective Classical Reality

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(48 reference statements)
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us first study the establishment and spread of correlations in the considered scenarios. As discussed in detail in many publications [ 6 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], this feature might have an impact on the notion of objectivity for a quantum state, in the spirit of so-called quantum Darwinism [ 3 ] (see, for example, ref. [ 7 ] for a recent review and references therein).…”
Section: Spreading Of Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us first study the establishment and spread of correlations in the considered scenarios. As discussed in detail in many publications [ 6 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], this feature might have an impact on the notion of objectivity for a quantum state, in the spirit of so-called quantum Darwinism [ 3 ] (see, for example, ref. [ 7 ] for a recent review and references therein).…”
Section: Spreading Of Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature is interpreted in the literature as quantum Darwinism [ 3 ], namely, a redundant storing of information about the system in different portions of the environment, allowing for a notion of objectivity, in the sense that the same information can be retrieved by different observers accessing distinct parts of the environment. It is to be stressed that the mutual information provides the standard choice of a correlation quantifier in this framework, though others were also considered [ 40 , 44 ]. This notion of objectivity is not uncontroversial; see [ 7 ] for a critical discussion and further developments.…”
Section: Spreading Of Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us first study the establishment and spread of correlations in the considered class of models. As discussed in detail in many publications [6,[23][24][25][39][40][41][42][43], this feature might have an impact on the notion of objectivity for a quantum state, in the spirit of the so-called quantum Darwinism [3] (see e.g. [7] for a recent review and references therein).…”
Section: Spreading Of Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature is interpreted in the literature as quantum Darwinism [3], namely a redundant storing of information about the system in different portions of the environment, allowing for a notion of objectivity, in the sense that the same information can be retrieved by different observers accessing distinct parts of the environment. It is to be stressed that the mutual information provides the standard choice of correlation quantifier in this framework, though others have also been considered [39,43]. This notion of objectivity is not uncontroversial, see [7] for a critical discussion and further developments.…”
Section: B Model Dependence Of Correlation Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regime was exploited in Ref. [13] where the authors investigated a model based on imperfect C-NOT gates and showed that relevant quantities for QD exhibit similar dependence on the size m of a fragment of environment F m including scaling independent from the quality of the imperfect C-NOT gates and the size of F m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%