2005
DOI: 10.2172/893809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBS Radionuclide Transport Abstraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly too strong a condition in the ABJM model. Here, we use the observation that a higher gauge theory on a principal 2-bundle with non-vanishing F can be reformulated as a higher gauge theory on a principal 3-bundle for which the fake curvature does vanish [7,2].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly too strong a condition in the ABJM model. Here, we use the observation that a higher gauge theory on a principal 2-bundle with non-vanishing F can be reformulated as a higher gauge theory on a principal 3-bundle for which the fake curvature does vanish [7,2].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that to impose (5.2), we have to generalize our differential crossed module A 4 t → g A 4 , as the triviality of t would imply F = 0. Note that a higher gauge theory on principal 2-bundles with non-vanishing fake curvature can be reformulated as a higher gauge theory on principal 3-bundles with vanishing fake curvature [38,39]. We used this idea previously to demonstrate that the ABJM model is a higher gauge theory [7].…”
Section: Fake Curvature Gauge Transformations and Differential 2-cromentioning
confidence: 99%