2011
DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2010.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological indicator values of some lichen species noted in Poland

Abstract: The paper presents the ecological indicator values for 360 lichen species noted in Poland. For the given species estimated were the climatic indicators (light, temperature, moisture) and the edaphic ones (trophicity, habitat acidity). The estimate is based mainly on field studies and Polish lichenological literature. Presented are also the dynamics tendencies, i.e expansion or dieback of the analyzed species. According to papers by Polish authors, concerning various groups of plants, used were five degrees' sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ). The preference of C. candelaris for drier habitats and the attachment of V. hemisphaerica to moderately moist habitats are suggested based on an overview of the data in the literature (Fabiszewski and Szczepańska 2010 ). According to Wirth ( 2010 ), both lichens are characterised by similar ecological indicator values, although the moisture value is somewhat higher for V. hemisphaerica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ). The preference of C. candelaris for drier habitats and the attachment of V. hemisphaerica to moderately moist habitats are suggested based on an overview of the data in the literature (Fabiszewski and Szczepańska 2010 ). According to Wirth ( 2010 ), both lichens are characterised by similar ecological indicator values, although the moisture value is somewhat higher for V. hemisphaerica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the ecological indicator values of lichens (Wirth ) as the best available information on the optima of ecological (realized) niches. For those species for which these values were not available, indicator values were designated according to information provided by Hallingbäck (), Wirth (), Thor & Arvidsson (), Dobson () and Fabiszewski & Szczepańska ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher scale values correspond with increased either light intensity, concentration of nutrients or pH of the habitat. A small number of lichen species that have not been previously characterised by Wirth were described using a similar 5-degree scale proposed by Fabiszewski and Szczepańska (2010) developed for species common in Poland. Note that the value '1' on this scale refers to the first two levels on Wirth's scale and the adopted value in this case was '1.5'.…”
Section: Ecological Indicator Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light indicator (L) for lichens surveyed in Gorce NP was in the range of 3-8. Most species were assigned value 5 (46% observations) corresponding with semi-shaded habitats (>10% of relative Table 3 Spearman's ranked correlation coefficient (rs) values between the IAP value and the mean of ecological scale indicator (L -insolation index, R -substrate reaction index, N -nutrition index; according to Wirth (2010) and Fabiszewski and Szczepańska (2010)), and the content of accumulated elements in Hypogymnia physodes thalli on study plots in Gorce NP in the three research years: 1993, 2013 intensity of natural light). It was found, that L values differ between sites depending on the type of forest community.…”
Section: Relationships Between Iap Accumulation Of Elements and Ecolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation