2015
DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Citizenship and Workplace Conflict in Anglo‐American Industrial Relations Systems

Abstract: This paper argues that the expansion of individual employment rights is presenting a series of challenges to the collective model of economic citizenship that prevailed in most of the AngloAmerican world during the last century. We examine developments in the management of workplace conflict in Anglo-American countries to highlight the institutional manoeuvrings that have been taking place to mould the nature of national regimes of employment rights. We argue that Governments almost everywhere are actively see… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currie and Tegue ( [71], p. 2) refer to a "huge expansion in individual employment rights that has occurred almost simultaneously across Anglo-American (sic) countries", and which "can be traced back to the 1970s" ( [71], p. 7). However, the authors go onto argue ( [71], p. 11) that "active efforts are occurring to design institutional arrangements to dull the impact of" this expansion.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currie and Tegue ( [71], p. 2) refer to a "huge expansion in individual employment rights that has occurred almost simultaneously across Anglo-American (sic) countries", and which "can be traced back to the 1970s" ( [71], p. 7). However, the authors go onto argue ( [71], p. 11) that "active efforts are occurring to design institutional arrangements to dull the impact of" this expansion.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currie and Tegue ( [71], p. 2) refer to a "huge expansion in individual employment rights that has occurred almost simultaneously across Anglo-American (sic) countries", and which "can be traced back to the 1970s" ( [71], p. 7). However, the authors go onto argue ( [71], p. 11) that "active efforts are occurring to design institutional arrangements to dull the impact of" this expansion. These efforts might be argued to have accelerated under the UK coalition government (2010-2015) and to have focussed on weakening enforcement, including through curtailing the enforcement powers and resources of the Equality and Human Rights Commission 2011 ( [72], p. 319); cuts to legal aid and to legal advice services ( [40], para.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supply‐side developments also contribute: including decisions by state conflict resolution agencies to devote more personnel and resources to assist organisations in proactive conflict avoidance and a growth in the availability of private practitioners, operating independently, or attached to consulting firms (Bray et al, 2018; Brown, 2014; Currie & Teague, 2016; Roche, 2015). The adoption of IBB has been linked to legacies of cooperative labour–management relations or ‘workplace partnership’, and efforts to achieve transformational change in the face of disruptive market pressures have been key influences (Bray et al, 2018; Cutcher‐Gershenfeld, 2014; Cutcher‐Gershenfeld & Kochan, 2004; Dobbins & Dundon, 2016; Eaton & Kochan, 2014; Kochan et al, 2016; Roche & Geary, 2006).…”
Section: The Nature and Genesis Of Collective Adrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries beyond the EU like Australia, Canada and New Zealand—countries that broadly share the Anglo‐American employment relations model that prevails in the UK—individual employment rights in areas such as equality, health and safety and employee rights in cases of business restructuring have been strengthened. Thus, although some UK employment laws have their origins in Brussels, in real terms, these reflect a type of regulatory convergence—with the possible notable exception of the USA—across advanced economies in relation to employment standard‐setting (Currie and Teague, ).…”
Section: Brexit and Eu Employment Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%