2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2011.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Econophysics: Bridges over a turbulent current

Abstract: In this editorial guide for the special issue on econophysics, we give a unique review of this young but quickly growing discipline. A suggestive taxonomy of the development is proposed by making a distinction between classical econophysics and modern econophysics. For each of these two stages of development, we identify the key economic issues whose formulations and/or treatments have been affected by physics or physicists, which includes value, business fluctuations, economic growth, economic and financial t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article is a contribution in line with the recent research aiming to increase the dialogue between physicists (particularly econophysicists) and financial economists (Ausloos, 2001(Ausloos, , 2013Bouchaud, 2002;Bouchaud et al, 2002;Carbone et al, 2007;Chakrabarti & Chakraborti, 2010;Chen & Li, 2012;Durlauf, 2005Durlauf, , 2012Farmer & Lux, 2008;Gabaix, 2009;, 2016Keen, 2003;Lux, 2009;McCauley, 2006McCauley, , 2009McCauley et al, 2007;Sornette, 2014;Stanley & Plerou, 2001). Actually, a recent article by Sornette (2014) offers a titillating example of largely widespread confusions about the distinction between econophysics and financial economics.…”
Section: I) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This article is a contribution in line with the recent research aiming to increase the dialogue between physicists (particularly econophysicists) and financial economists (Ausloos, 2001(Ausloos, , 2013Bouchaud, 2002;Bouchaud et al, 2002;Carbone et al, 2007;Chakrabarti & Chakraborti, 2010;Chen & Li, 2012;Durlauf, 2005Durlauf, , 2012Farmer & Lux, 2008;Gabaix, 2009;, 2016Keen, 2003;Lux, 2009;McCauley, 2006McCauley, , 2009McCauley et al, 2007;Sornette, 2014;Stanley & Plerou, 2001). Actually, a recent article by Sornette (2014) offers a titillating example of largely widespread confusions about the distinction between econophysics and financial economics.…”
Section: I) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This article is a contribution in line with the recent research aiming to increase the dialogue between physicists (particularly econophysicists) and financial economists (Ausloos, 2001(Ausloos, , 2013Bouchaud, 2002;Bouchaud et al, 2002;Carbone et al, 2007;Chakrabarti & Chakraborti, 2010;Chen & Li, 2012;Durlauf, 2005Durlauf, , 2012Farmer & Lux, 2008;Gabaix, 2009;, 2016Keen, 2003;Lux, 2009;McCauley, 2006McCauley, , 2009McCauley et al, 2007;Sornette, 2014;Stanley & Plerou, 2001). Actually, a recent article by Sornette (2014) offers a titillating example of largely widespread confusions about the distinction between econophysics and financial economics.…”
Section: I) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Consequently, due to these differences, it is more difficult for econophysicists to get past the gatekeepers of financial economics journals. However, beyond this observation, we must stress that in recent years more and more joint publications (such as this special issue, for example) and research have been developed, taking part in bridging the gap between these two scientific cultures (Ausloos, 2001;Bouchaud, 2002;Carbone et al, 2007;Chakrabarti & Chakraborti, 2010;Chen & Li, 2012;Durlauf, 2005;Farmer & Lux, 2008;Gabaix, 2009;Keen, 2003;Lux, 2009;McCauley, 2006;Stanley & Plerou, 2001).…”
Section: Different Scientific Culturesmentioning
confidence: 94%