2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial commentFunctional assessment of bypass grafts by fractional flow reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), multivessel FFR, or PCI that was performed in a non-FFR artery were also excluded because of the inability to distinguish clinical outcomes related to the vessel that was assessed by FFR. Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was also excluded because FFR measurements may be confounded by native artery patency . Implausible FFR values (<0.30 and ≥1.00) were also excluded .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), multivessel FFR, or PCI that was performed in a non-FFR artery were also excluded because of the inability to distinguish clinical outcomes related to the vessel that was assessed by FFR. Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was also excluded because FFR measurements may be confounded by native artery patency . Implausible FFR values (<0.30 and ≥1.00) were also excluded .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure wire derived FFR is a widely accepted and extensively studied diagnostic modality to assess the physiological significance of epicardial coronary stenosis. This method is less well validated in bypass grafts but specificity and negative predictive value are comparable to stress MPI . Therefore, FFR is believed to be as clinically useful and lesion specific in grafts as it is in native coronary arteries and the same cut off (0.75–0.80) for physiological significance is recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With FFR <0.75, further revascularisation is needed, preferably on the native vessel. With FFR >0.80, no invasive treatment is needed 26,27 . Image-based computational functional models have not been fully validated in CABG patients.…”
Section: Cabgmentioning
confidence: 99%